In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:21-md-02981
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Winston & Strawn
- Willkie Farr
- Altair Law
- Gustafson Gluek
- Tostrud Law Group
- Morgan Lewis
- Covington & Burling
- Spiro Harrison
- Kaplan Fox
- Cravath Swaine
- Forman Watkins
- Stradling Yocca
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Paul Hastings
- Hogan Lovells
- Munger Tolles
- Faegre Drinker
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- DiCello Levitt
- Zelle LLP
- Wilson Sonsini
- Korein Tillery
- Pritzker Levine
- Fox Rothschild
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Tyz Law Group
- Barrett Law Group
- Milberg Coleman
- Hausfeld LLP
- Paul Weiss
- Hadsell Stormer
- Benedict Law Group
- Kwun Bhansali
- Venable LLP
- Ellis George
- Hagens Berman
- Hueston Hennigan
- Quinn Emanuel
- Williams & Connolly
- A&O Shearman
- Frederick M. Lehrer Attorney at Law
- Mantese Honigman
- Foley & Lardner
- Keller Rohrback
- Gibson Dunn
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- Sidley Austin
- Bartlit Beck
- McManis Faulkner
- Cotchett Pitre
- Miller Barondess
- Scott&Scott
- Dechert LLP
- Annaguey McCann
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Sperling Kenny
- Berger Montague
- Kirby McInerney
- Saveri & Saveri
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- American Antitrust Institute
- Hulu LLC
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Match Group LLC
- Netflix Inc.
- TikTok Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Riot Games Inc.
- Epic Games Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Google LLC
- Sony Group Corp.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Bumble Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Big Fish Games Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Activision Blizzard Inc.
- Alphabet Inc.
- Electronic Arts Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- The Walt Disney Co.
Government Agencies
- State of Indiana
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Tennessee
- State of Nevada
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Michigan
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 28, 2023
Expert's Exclusion Imperils Class Of 21M Android Users
In an abrupt turnaround that could undo the certification of 21 million Android users challenging Google's control of the Play Store, U.S. District Judge James Donato on Monday excluded key expert analysis that had underpinned the consumers' arguments.
-
August 15, 2023
Antitrust Watchers Are About To Have Their Hands Full
A deluge of trials and key hearings are slated for the coming weeks in antitrust cases spread across the country, including the first expected trials for monopolization claims against Google, trials in a variety of other conduct cases from enforcers and private parties, and hearings on several merger challenges.
-
August 11, 2023
Google Rips Bid To Split Epic, Match Fight From Antitrust Trial
Google has slammed a request by Epic Games, Match Group, state attorneys general and consumers to allow their antitrust case over Google's Play Store to go to trial this November without the tech giant's contract counterclaims against Epic and Match, arguing that holding separate trials would be inefficient and "disjointed."
-
August 03, 2023
Google Judge Rejects Multiple Trials As 'Recipe For Disaster'
A California federal judge refused Thursday to grant Google summary judgment on multiple issues in sprawling antitrust litigation alleging it monopolizes app distribution ahead of a Nov. 6 jury trial, and warned he won't hold multiple trials on identical claims brought by different plaintiffs, saying, "That's a recipe for disaster."
-
August 01, 2023
Google Judge Warms To $10.5B Damages Theory In 'Hot Tub'
A California federal judge questioning economic experts during a courtroom "hot tub" Tuesday in a case claiming Google monopolizes the market for distributing apps on Android devices said the economic theory behind the plaintiffs' $10.5 billion damages calculation appeared "slightly exotic" but also "perfectly reasonable."
-
May 19, 2023
States, Others Oppose Google Bid To Trim Play Store Case
State-level enforcers, consumers and developers urged a California federal court not to trim their allegations that Google monopolizes the distribution of apps on Android devices, so a jury will get to see the full extent of the tech giant's unlawful conduct.
-
May 16, 2023
Disagreement Persists Over Google Play Store Trial Structure
Google LLC continues to push a California district court to hold separate trials on monopolization claims from state enforcers and developers Epic Games and Match Group over its Play Store policies, after a class of consumers agreed to wait for a Ninth Circuit ruling on Google's appeal of the class certification.
-
April 24, 2023
Consumers, States Want $3M From Google For Chat Deletion
Consumers, state enforcers and Match Group, who allege Google monopolizes the market for distributing apps on Android devices, asked a California federal judge Friday to order the tech giant to pay $3 million to cover their costs associated with bringing a sanctions motion over Google's automatic deletion of internal chats.
-
April 21, 2023
Google Wants Play Store Antitrust Case Trimmed Before Trial
Google asked a California federal judge to trim claims off sprawling litigation over allegations the tech giant monopolizes the market for distributing apps on Android devices, scoffing at the claim it violated antitrust law by refusing to distribute rival app stores within the Google Play Store.
-
April 20, 2023
Antitrust Judge Won't Delay Nov. Google Play Store Trial
A California federal judge denied on Thursday Google's request to delay a jury trial to await the outcome of its appeal of an order certifying a 21 million consumer class in sprawling antitrust litigation over allegations Google monopolizes its Android Play Store, saying repeatedly that the November jury trial "is happening."