Case in other court:
Case Number:
3:16-md-02738
Court:
Nature of Suit:
367 Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Drohan Lee
- Umhofer Mitchell
- Shanley Law Offices
- Ross Feller Casey
- Marshall Dennehey
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- The Dietrich Law Firm
- Chisholm & Chisholm
- Lieff Cabraser
- Bruster PLLC
- Girardi & Keese
- Law Offices of James Scott Farrin
- Heard Merman
- Peiffer Wolf
- Parker Waichman
- Burns Charest
- Lenze Lawyers
- Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
- Levin Sedran
- Pate Law Firm
- Habush Habush
- Sutter & Gillham
- Singleton Schreiber
- Bovis Kyle
- Goss Law Firm PC
- Murray Law Firm LLC
- Baldante & Rubenstein
- Smith Law Attorneys
- Wallace & Graham
- Milberg Coleman
- Guerra LLP
- Goldberg Persky
- Meyers & Flowers
- Friedman Rubin
- Szaferman Lakind
- Waters Kraus
- Trammell PC
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Belluck Law
- Dreesen Law Firm
- Parafinczuk Wolf
- Dalton & Associates PA
- Nachawati Law Group
- Grossman & Moore
- Cohen Placitella
- Nass Cancelliere
- Robins Cloud
- Hutton & Hutton Law Firm
- Potts Law Firm
- Cheeley Law Group
- Fox Rothschild
- Dolce Panepinto
- Axelrod Firm
- Rheingold Giuffra
- Beasley Allen
- VSCP Law
- Heninger Garrison
- Huber Thomas
- Gitlin Horn
- Bernheim Kelley
- DiCello Levitt
- Seeger Weiss
- Jazlowiecki & Jazlowiecki
- The Flood Law Firm
- Craig Swapp
- Barker Patterson
- King & Spalding
- Matern Law Group
- Kline & Specter
- Pourciau Law
- Power Rogers
- Schenck Price
- Hardin Kundla
- Boucher LLP
- Morelli Law Firm
- Wexler Boley
- Coughlin Midlige
- McDonnell & Associates
- Rahdert & Mortimer
- Sullivan Papain
- Walsh Pizzi
- Faegre Drinker
- Luby Law Firm
- Montgomery McCracken
- Reeves & Goff
- Barry McTiernan
- Luff Law Firm
- Lanier Law Firm
- Bourdette & Partners
- Slater Slater
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Morris Bart
- Eisenberg Rothweiler
- Michael Brady Lynch Firm
- Drummond Woodsum
- Javerbaum Wurgaft
- Kopelowitz Ostrow
- Messa & Associates
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Richardson Thomas
- Gainsburgh Benjamin
- Motley Rice
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Weinstein Caggiano
- Cellino Law
- Eichen Crutchlow
- Walker Hamilton & Kearns
- FrancoLaw PLLC
- Levy Konigsberg
- Wilentz Goldman
- Rourke & Blumenthal
- Merson Law
- Elliot Morgan Parsonage
- Bruera Law Firm
- Durham Pittard
- Aylstock Witkin
- Robinson Calcagnie
- Anapol Weiss
- Bernstein Liebhard
- Kanner & Whiteley
- Reilly McDevitt
- Shook Hardy
- Klehr Harrison
- Chaffin Luhana LLP
- Chappell Smith
- Richardson Richardson Boudreaux
- Corboy & Demetrio
- Weitz & Luxenberg
- Neal & Harwell
- Karon LLC
- Gacovino Lake
- Kelley & Ferraro
- Fears Nachawati
- Ketterer Browne
- George & Farinas
- Kibbey Wagner
- Akerman LLP
- Berger Montague
- Phillips & Paolicelli
- Morgan & Morgan
- Ashcraft & Gerel
- Baron & Budd
- Hart McLaughlin
- Fox Willis
- Goldenberg Heller
- Golomb Legal
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Labaton Keller
- Law Offices of Eric H. Weinberg
Companies
- CVS Health Corp.
- Personal Care Products Council
- Rio Tinto Group
- Merial Limited
- Kenneth Cole Productions Inc.
- Coty Inc.
- Porsche
- IRIS International, Inc.
- Walmart Inc.
- Chevron Corp.
- Imerys SA
- SLM Corp.
- Cara Operations Ltd.
- Otis Worldwide Corp.
- KIRA LLC
- Johnson & Johnson
- DeNA Co.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 02, 2025
J&J Again Seeks To Block Beasley Allen In NJ Talc Litigation
Johnson & Johnson has opposed a New Jersey talc claimant's motion for the pro hac vice admission of two attorneys from The Beasley Allen Law Firm, claiming the partners' conduct in its talc unit's bankruptcy proceedings warrants denial of the application.
-
September 23, 2024
J&J Accuses Beasley Allen Of Casting Bogus Talc Ballots
Johnson & Johnson has accused the Beasley Allen Law Firm of casting about two dozen false ballots against the company's latest talc bankruptcy plan without voters' consent and urged a New Jersey federal court to remove the firm from the plaintiff's steering committee as a consequence.
-
August 13, 2024
'Clever' Scheme Is Concealing Talc Litigation Funding, J&J Says
The Beasley Allen Law Firm needs to disclose alleged litigation funding fueling its litigation over Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder even if that funding was not given directly to the firm since the disclosure rules apply to "parties" and not "law firms," J&J has told a New Jersey federal court.
-
August 07, 2024
Law Firms Fight J&J Bid To Revive Talc Subpoenas
The Beasley Allen Law Firm, the steering committee of talc plaintiffs suing Johnson & Johnson, and a third-party law firm urged the New Jersey federal court this week to reject a bid from the pharmaceutical company to reinstate subpoenas seeking evidence of alleged third-party litigation funding.
-
July 22, 2024
Lack Of 'Smoking Gun' Sinks J&J's Bid To DQ Beasley Allen
The Beasley Allen Law Firm may represent plaintiffs in multicounty talc injury litigation in New Jersey state court, after a judge found Johnson & Johnson failed to show a former Faegre Drinker outside counsel shared information he learned representing the company in earlier talc litigation.
-
July 11, 2024
Talc Law Firms Beat J&J Subpoenas Seeking Funding Info
The Beasley Allen Law Firm, another plaintiffs law firm and a litigation funder defeated subpoenas from Johnson & Johnson in talc litigation, with a special master reasoning that the broad swath of discovery permitted in federal courts still has limits.
-
July 02, 2024
Beasley Allen Slams J&J's DQ Bid 'Check-Up' In Talc Tort
The Beasley Allen Law Firm and Johnson & Johnson continue to spar over the firm and attorney Andy Birchfield's role in long-running federal and state mass torts over talcum powder injuries, with the firm calling out J&J on Tuesday for "prodding" the New Jersey courts to boot the lawyers from the litigation.
-
June 18, 2024
J&J Fights Law Firm's Bid To Nix Subpoenas In Talc Brawl
Information about the Beasley Allen Law Firm's litigation funding and settlement communications is relevant and necessary to resolving long-running multidistrict litigation over Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products and so should be turned over, the pharmaceutical giant has told a New Jersey federal court.
-
June 06, 2024
Law Firm Says Axe 'Draconian' J&J Subpoena In Talc Claim
A Mississippi plaintiffs firm urged a New Jersey federal court on Thursday to quash a subpoena served by Johnson & Johnson requesting that the firm turn over documents related to litigation funding and its communication with media outlets, calling the subpoena "draconian" and improper as the firm is not a party to the pharmaceutical giant's current personal injury litigation surrounding its talcum powder products.
-
May 31, 2024
Beasley Allen Wants J&J Subpoenas Nixed Amid Ethics Fight
The Beasley Allen Law Firm and a plaintiff steering committee in the Johnson & Johnson talc litigation blasted subpoenas directed at the firm and others aimed at turning up evidence of an alleged scheme to muster opposition to J&J's latest $6.5 billion bankruptcy plan.