General Liability

  • November 05, 2025

    Mich. Justices Probe Nationwide's Combined Tax Filing Win

    Two Michigan Supreme Court justices questioned Wednesday whether the state's tax statutes governing insurance companies exclude key phrases that would allow Nationwide entities to file as a unitary group that can share credits among its members.

  • November 05, 2025

    Husch Blackwell Brings On Morris Manning Insurance Pro

    Husch Blackwell LLP has brought on a Morris Manning & Martin LLP attorney in its Atlanta office, strengthening the firm with an attorney experienced in handling complex insurance coverage litigation and commercial litigation, the firm announced Wednesday.

  • November 05, 2025

    6th Circ. Says Asbestos Reinsurance Fight Can't Be Rehashed

    An Amerisure unit can't seek reimbursement from reinsurer Swiss Re for defense costs paid in underlying asbestos litigation against a building material manufacturer, the Sixth Circuit affirmed, saying the issue has already been decided in arbitration proceedings with another reinsurer.

  • November 04, 2025

    Insurer Escapes Defense Duty In Fatal Drunk Driving Case

    An insurer has no duty to defend a bowling center against claims that it overserved alcohol to a patron who then drove and killed another motorist, a New Mexico federal court ruled, finding that the policy's liquor liability exclusion bars coverage.

  • November 03, 2025

    Parade Shooting Victims, Organizers Seek To Ax Insurer's Suit

    Individuals who were injured in a mass shooting at the 2024 Kansas City Chiefs' Super Bowl parade and the event's organizers asked a Missouri federal court to toss an insurer's bid to escape coverage, arguing that the carrier's suit should be dismissed due to a related state court case.

  • November 03, 2025

    Apparel Co. Demands Defense Coverage For Adidas TM Suit

    Apparel brand Aviator Nation Inc. told a California federal court that its general liability carrier must defend an ongoing lawsuit from Adidas America Inc. alleging that Aviator Nation violated Adidas' famous "three-stripe" trademark, saying that even the potential for coverage triggers an insurer's duty to defend.

  • October 31, 2025

    Insurer Not Liable For Crypto Settlement Row, Judge Says

    An insurer for an attorney and his practice does not owe $275,000 to an investment company over a soured cryptocurrency deal that ended in a $700,000 settlement, a Pennsylvania federal court ruled, finding that a contractual liability exclusion in the attorney's policy applies. 

  • October 31, 2025

    Mich. Panel Revives Woman's Claim For No-Fault Benefits

    A Michigan state appeals court revived a woman's suit seeking personal injury protection benefits after a car crash, finding one exclusion in her no-fault policy invalid because it contravenes the state's no-fault law and another dependent on whether a Progressive unit was the insurer of the subject vehicle.

  • October 31, 2025

    Insurers Denied Bid To Stay Avon's Ch. 11 Plan For Appeal

    A Delaware bankruptcy judge denied a motion Thursday from insurers at Lloyd's of London to stay Avon Inc.'s Chapter 11 plan while the insurers appeal, finding the insurers had not shown they would be irreparably harmed by the plan taking effect.

  • October 31, 2025

    Insurer, Subcontractor Settle Sinkhole Coverage Dispute

    A subcontractor and its insurer told a Washington federal court that they've settled their coverage dispute over whether the subcontractor lodged an untimely defense tender for a now-settled counterclaim concerning a sinkhole at a Seattle ship canal project.

  • October 30, 2025

    Cyber Coverage Growing Amid More Ransomware, Pro Says

    Ransomware attacks have been increasing in recent years, while the market for cyberinsurance is growing and becoming more competitive, said a cyberinsurance expert at a media briefing from the American Academy of Actuaries on Thursday.

  • October 30, 2025

    Pa. Justices' Auto Exclusion Ruling May Spur Policy Changes

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is tackling whether policy language precluding coverage for injuries "arising out of" the ownership or use of "autos" is ambiguous, and its answer could set up auto liability carriers in the state to reevaluate how they define such terms even in standard form policies, experts say.

  • October 30, 2025

    NC Justices Asked To Weigh In On Solar Co.'s Insurance Fight

    A solar panel company urged the North Carolina Supreme Court to review its failed attempt to vacate a $1.4 million judgment it was ordered to pay an insurer, arguing that a lower court's opinion unduly narrows rules on vacating default judgments.

  • October 30, 2025

    Massive Liability Issues Centered At Anderson Kill Conference

    Evolving cyber and artificial intelligence risks, along with the massive claims associated with forever chemicals and sexual abuse suits, should be among the top insurance considerations for policyholders today, attorneys and brokers said at a conference hosted by Anderson Kill PC.

  • October 30, 2025

    NASCAR Driver Says Life Insurer Pitched Him 'Financial Trap'

    NASCAR driver Kyle Busch and his wife said they lost $8.5 million after they were allegedly bamboozled by Pacific Life Insurance Co. and an insurance producer to invest in complex life insurance policies as a form of tax-free retirement income, according to a North Carolina state court complaint.

  • October 30, 2025

    Allstate Says Whirlpool Must Pay For Dishwasher Fire Damage

    An Allstate insurer told a Pennsylvania federal court that it is entitled to recoup more than $100,000 from Whirlpool Corp. after a dishwasher the company manufactured set fire to a policyholder's property.

  • October 30, 2025

    Insurance Litigation Week In Review

    The Second Circuit upheld Citgo's $54.2 million judgment against insurers over seized Venezuelan oil cargo, a California federal court officially approved an $80 million class settlement over life insurance terminations and a New York federal court sent the state's data breach lawsuit against Allstate entities back to state court. Here, Law360 takes a look at the past week's top insurance news.

  • October 30, 2025

    Insurer Aims To Trim Woman's $7.5M Crash Coverage Suit

    A food service distributor's auto insurer asked a Connecticut federal court to toss a woman's claim that it violated the state's unfair trade and insurance practices laws when handling an underlying crash dispute that resulted in a $7.5 million judgment.

  • October 29, 2025

    Concrete Co. Not Covered In $10M Defect Suit, Insurer Says

    A concrete subcontractor accused by a general contractor of causing more than $10 million in damage to a 461-unit condominium project in downtown Denver is not entitled to coverage under the contractor's policy, an insurer told a Colorado federal court.

  • October 29, 2025

    Insurer Can't Avoid Massage Therapist's Coverage Claims

    An insurer can drop its claims against a massage therapist in a dispute over coverage for an underlying malpractice contention but cannot escape the therapist's counterclaims for declaratory relief and breach of contract, a Minnesota federal court ruled.

  • October 28, 2025

    Insurers Can't Avoid Tanger's COVID Coverage Suit In NC

    Two insurers can't avoid Tanger Outlets' lawsuit seeking coverage for more than $50 million in pandemic losses, North Carolina's business court ruled, finding the retail outlet chain sufficiently connected its insured interests to its operations in North Carolina.

  • October 28, 2025

    2nd Circ. Upholds $54M Award To Citgo In Oil Cargo Dispute

    The Second Circuit affirmed a $54 million judgment for Citgo Petroleum Corp. in its suit seeking coverage for oil cargo lost during political unrest in Venezuela, finding Tuesday that a lower court did not err or abuse its discretion in rulings on summary judgment, judicial notice and jury instructions.

  • October 28, 2025

    Insurer Says Late Notice Dooms $7.5M Crash Coverage

    A food distributor's excess insurer told a Connecticut state court it should owe no coverage for a nearly $7.5 million judgment stemming from an automobile collision involving a company worker whom a jury found at fault, saying it only learned of the case after an unsuccessful appeal.

  • October 27, 2025

    Title Insurer Avoids Coverage For Road Ownership Dispute

    A property owner's title insurer owes no coverage for an underlying quiet title action over ownership of a private road between two separate properties, a New York federal court ruled, finding coverage exceptions in two policies relating to the rights of parties "in possession" were applicable.

  • October 24, 2025

    Fla. Landlord Not Covered In Rat Infestation Suit, Insurer Says

    An insurer said it has no duty to defend or indemnify a landlord accused of causing its tenants to get sick from a rat infestation and unsanitary conditions, telling a Florida federal court Friday that its policy bars coverage for bodily injury arising out of organic pathogens and pollutants.

Expert Analysis

  • Justices' Ch. 11 Ruling Is A Big Moment For Debtors' Insurers

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Truck Insurance v. Kaiser Gypsum ruling upends decades of Chapter 11 bankruptcy jurisprudence that relegated a debtor’s insurer to the sidelines, giving insurers a new footing to try and avoid significant liability, say Stuart Gordon and Benjamin Wisher at Rivkin Radler.

  • 7th Circ Joins Trend Of No CGL Coverage For Structural Flaws

    Author Photo

    The Seventh Circuit, which recently held potential structural instability did not count as property damage under a construction company's commercial general liability policy, joins a growing consensus that faulty work does not implicate coverage without tangible and present damage to the project, say Sarah Abrams at Baleen Specialty, and Elan Kandel and James Talbert at Bailey Cavalieri.

  • 7th Circ. Exclusion Ruling Will Narrow BIPA Coverage

    Author Photo

    The Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Thermoflex Waukegan v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance, holding that the access or disclosure exclusion applies to insurance claims brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, departs from the majority rule and opens the door to insurers more firmly denying coverage under general liability policies, say attorneys at Perkins Coie.

  • Revisiting Scalia's 'What's It To You?' After Kaiser Ruling

    Author Photo

    While the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser allows insurers to be considered "parties in interest" in Chapter 11 cases, they still need to show they would face an injury in fact, answering the late Justice Antonin Scalia's "what's it to you?" question, say Brent Weisenberg and Jeff Prol at Lowenstein Sandler.

  • Calif. Long-Tail Ruling Continues Policyholder-Friendly Trend

    Author Photo

    The California Supreme Court's recent ruling in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum, rejecting horizontal policy exhaustion, was the latest in a string of its decisions involving insurance coverage for continuous or progressive injury claims that favor policyholders, say Billie Mandelbaum and David Goodwin at Covington.

  • NY Banking Brief: All The Notable Legal Updates In Q2

    Author Photo

    The second quarter of 2024 saw less enforcement activity in the realm of New York financial services, but brought substantial regulatory and legislative developments, including state regulators' guidance on cybersecurity compliance and customer service processes for virtual currency entities, say James Vivenzio and Andrew Lucas at Perkins Coie.

  • NJ Justices Clarify First-Party Indemnification Availability

    Author Photo

    In Boyle v. Huff, the New Jersey Supreme Court recently held that indemnification can be available in first-party claims, resolving an open question and setting up contracting parties for careful negotiations around indemnity clauses, says Todd Leon at Marshall Dennehey.

  • Takeaways From Justices' Redemption Insurance Decision

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Connelly v. U.S. examines how to determine the fair market value of shares in a closely held company for estate tax purposes, and clarifies how life insurance held by the company to enable redemption of a decedent’s shares affects that calculation, says Evelyn Haralampu at Burns & Levinson.

  • Insurers Have A Ch. 11 Voice Following High Court Ruling

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum — which reaffirmed a broad definition of "party in interest" — will give insurers, particularly in mass tort Chapter 11 bankruptcies, more opportunity to protect their interests and identify problems with reorganization plans, says George Singer at Holland & Hart.

  • 8th Circ. Insurance Ruling Spotlights Related-Claims Defenses

    Author Photo

    The Eighth Circuit’s recent Dexon v. Travelers ruling — that the insurer must provide a defense despite the policy’s related-acts provision — provides guidance for how policyholders can overcome related-acts defenses, say Geoffrey Fehling and Jae Lynn Huckaba at Hunton.

  • Managing Legal Risks After University Gaza Protests

    Author Photo

    Following the protests sparked by the war in Gaza, colleges and universities should expect a long investigative tail and take steps to mitigate risks associated with compliance issues under various legal frameworks and institutional policies, say Wiley's Diana Shaw and Colin Cloherty.

  • An Insurance Coverage Checklist For PFAS Defendants

    Author Photo

    With PFAS liability exposures attracting increased media attention, now is a good time for companies that could be exposed to liability related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to review existing and past insurance policies, and consider taking proactive steps to maximize their likelihood of coverage, say attorneys at Nossaman.

  • Class Actions At The Circuit Courts: May Lessons

    Author Photo

    In this month's review of class action appeals, Mitchell Engel at Shook Hardy discusses four notable circuit court decisions on topics from automobile insurance to securities — and provides key takeaways for counsel on issues including circuit-specific ascertainability requirements and how to conduct a Daubert analysis prior to class certification.