Dang v. Walgreens Co.

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:22-cv-00177

Court:

Illinois Northern

Nature of Suit:

370 Other Fraud

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Firms

  1. January 11, 2024

    Walgreens Loses Bid To Reroute Pain Patch Marketing Suit

    Walgreens has traveled too far down the path of litigating a customer's pain patch deception claims to be able to now steer the dispute to arbitration, an Illinois federal judge ruled Wednesday.

  2. July 24, 2023

    Walgreens Seeks To Force Pain Patch Suit Into Arbitration

    Walgreens says an Illinois consumer can't proceed with her class claims that the pharmacy chain misled consumers by marketing its lidocaine pain relief patches as "maximum strength," arguing she agreed to arbitrate her claims on an individual basis when she joined a loyalty program. 

  3. March 03, 2023

    Walgreens Can't Ax Suit Over 'Maximum Strength' Labels

    An Illinois federal judge trimmed some fraud and warranty breach claims from a nationwide proposed class action accusing Walgreens of misleading consumers in marketing its pain relief patches as "maximum strength," but held that the bulk of the false ad suit can proceed beyond the dismissal stage.

  4. January 12, 2022

    Walgreens Sued Over 'Maximum Strength' Pain Relief Claims

    A proposed class of customers hit Walgreens with a lawsuit in Illinois federal court Tuesday alleging that the pharmaceutical giant misled them in marketing its pain relief patches and cream as "maximum strength" when there are products available in the market that contain a higher percentage of lidocaine.