The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday accepted network support products provider Cyan Inc.’s petition to review whether state courts have jurisdiction to hear investor suits over securities offerings, agreeing to resolve an issue that has divided lower courts.
Dish Network won a pause on a $280 million judgment against the company for violations of do-not-call laws when an Illinois federal judge granted its request for more time to launch its appeal, according to an order on Monday.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a Seventh Circuit decision from earlier this year that rejected a First Amendment challenge to an Indiana ban on robocalls by an Illinois not-for-profit, Patriotic Veterans Inc.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a federal prosecutor-turned-whistleblower’s appeal in a False Claims Act suit accusing telecom companies of overbilling the government for wiretapping services.
A set of corporate and individual defendants have agreed to settle a case in which the Federal Trade Commission alleged that a handful of telecom companies perpetrated a $70 million scheme that tacked fees onto consumers' telephone bills.
Despite a contentious confirmation hearing for Justice Neil Gorsuch, the U.S. Supreme Court term itself was mellow this year, with more unanimous cases and fewer controversial decisions. Still, there were a handful of business rulings that packed a punch.
One firm went undefeated at the U.S. Supreme Court this term. Another built on last year’s winning streak. And some high court powerhouses took their lumps. Here, Law360 breaks down how the firms most frequently seen at oral arguments performed this term.
Intellectual property cases took four of the top 10 spots on Law360's ranking of the U.S. Supreme Court cases that attracted the most amicus briefs this term, as disputes involving issues like patent exhaustion and offensive trademarks each generated dozens of amicus filings.
The New Jersey Senate unanimously passed legislation Monday that would require hotels to upgrade their phone systems to allow guests to dial 911 without having to dial another digit first, ensuring that hotel guests have easy access to emergency personnel.
Challengers to the Federal Communications Commission’s move to deregulate the market for business data, or special access, services have urged the agency to pause the effective date for the change during litigation, saying businesses will otherwise face major losses.
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai said in remarks Monday in Sweden that the agency’s proposal to reverse course on the 2015 Open Internet Order will bring back an earlier “light touch” approach and clear the way for network investment.
Some telecom service providers are paying more than their fair share to support Federal Communications Commission bureau services, trade groups told the agency in a series of recent filings that argued fiscal year 2017 regulatory fees should be more evenly distributed.
A top television executive at Black Entertainment Television LLC asked a California federal court Friday to toss gender bias claims made against him by a female executive under Title VII and California’s Fair Employment & Housing Act, saying those statutes don’t impart individual liability for discrimination on supervisors.
The focus for telecommunications so far this year has mostly been on the newly Republican-led Federal Communications Commission and not courtroom drama, but courts have also already made decisions related to net neutrality and the limits of FCC authority. Here are the top telecom cases so far in 2017.
Two suitors remain in the battle to buy Swiss power meter manufacturer Landis & Gyr, Germany-based restaurant chain Vapiano could raise up to €184 million in an IPO this week, and Telefonica is mulling a flotation of its Argentine business.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday invited the federal government to submit a brief in Samsung's appeal of a Federal Circuit decision that it must pay $120 million for infringing Apple’s smartphone patents, according to the high court’s federal docket.
The Federal Circuit sided with T-Mobile on Friday after the wireless carrier fended off a $100 million infringement lawsuit by Prism Technologies LLC at trial, and it went further than the lower court by invalidating Prism’s authentication server patents as noninventive, abstract ideas under Alice.
Rep. Dan Lipinski, D-Ill., has led a group of House lawmakers in urging the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday to ensure continued consumer protections against "ringless" robocalls sent directly to consumer voicemail, continuing the backlash against a company’s request that was pulled this week at the FCC.
The Federal Circuit on Friday affirmed Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions that largely upheld the validity of three Straight Path IP patents related to real-time video teleconferencing technology, handing the licensing firm a decisive win after a series of attacks from telecom giants like Samsung and Cisco.
A May disruption to the Federal Communications Commission's online comment system was caused by a cyberattack from traffic that mostly didn't leave comments, the FCC has told lawmakers, saying the problem has been addressed and the system is handling all net neutrality comments.
It was a privilege to spend a half-hour on the phone with the nation's foremost First Amendment lawyer. Floyd Abrams and I discussed his career, his new book and what he sees in his free-speech crystal ball. And he was a very good sport when I asked if it is constitutionally protected to yell inside a movie theater: “Citizens United is a terrible decision and should be set on fire,” says Randy Maniloff of White and Williams LLP.
What law firms should be learning from a number of recent surveys is that they will not be able to rely on the never-ending flood of associate candidates their business model demands as long as they require them to dedicate all day, most nights, every weekend and all holidays to firm business, says Jill Dessalines, founder of Strategic Advice for Successful Lawyers and former assistant GC at McKesson Corp.
Despite legal education training and the focus on logic and reason by the courts, lawyers address emotional issues on a daily basis — albeit more indirectly. But a shift to consciously and strategically addressing emotions gives us a powerful tool to help our clients reach faster, better decisions, say dispute resolution experts Robert Creo and Selina Shultz.
The guessing game around Justice Anthony Kennedy’s possible retirement is reaching a crescendo. Yet the speculation does more than fuel bookmakers’ odds. It draws attention to his pivotal role as the court’s swing vote, says Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice.
China's current judicial practices appear to indicate that standard-essential patent holders are in a favorable condition to commence relevant patent infringement litigation to protect legitimate rights and interests in China, say attorneys with Tian Yuan Law Firm.
One way to combat juror confusion and boredom is to allow jurors to ask witnesses questions. No federal evidentiary or court rule prohibits it, and every federal circuit court to address the practice has held it permissible, say Stephen Susman, Richard Lorren Jolly and Dr. Roy Futterman of the NYU School of Law Civil Jury Project.
Consensus is building that the U.S. Supreme Court should grant the petition to hear Samsung v. Apple. The issue that has received the most attention from the amici briefs and the most pages from the parties is how the Federal Circuit applied the obviousness analysis, say Derek Dahlgren and Spencer Johnson of Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck PC.
Last month, the American Bar Association published revised guidance regarding an attorney’s duty to protect sensitive client material in light of recent high-profile hacks. The first step in compliance is understanding how your data is being stored and accessed. There are three key questions you should ask your firm’s information technology staff and/or external solution vendors, says Nick Holda of PreVeil.
The Ninth Circuit was correct in its finding that any fair-use analysis for a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice is a fact-based, subjective determination. According to the Lenz petition for certiorari, the Ninth Circuit’s decision would open the floodgates for a slew of unreasonable claims as grounds for removal of online speech — but the petition conflates incorrectly “subjective beliefs” with “unreasonable beliefs,... (continued)