A Missouri federal judge on Wednesday cut a punitive damages award that a Missouri farm won against Monsanto and BASF in a bellwether trial over claims the weedkiller dicamba ruined the farm's peach trees from $250 million to $60 million, ruling that the case involved only economic damages as opposed to physical harm.
The Second Circuit revived a securities suit against China-based TAL Education Group on Wednesday after finding investors had sufficiently supported their claims that TAL secretly controlled two companies in which it had invested.
A Missouri federal judge on Wednesday gave his blessing to a proposed $5 million class settlement resolving Walmart shoppers' claims that the retail giant stiffed customers on full refunds when accepting returns.
A computer crime law whose scope has been hotly debated since it was passed in 1984 will be in the limelight Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether a Georgia police officer violated federal law by abusing his access to an online government database. Here's a breakdown of three key questions that may arise and could decide where the court ultimately comes down.
Norwegian Cruise Line slammed investors' claims that it ran a "top-down" deceptive sales campaign downplaying the COVID-19 pandemic to prospective customers in order to stave off revenue losses, maintaining that it doesn't have to disclose allegedly aggressive sales practices.
A California federal judge has dismissed a proposed nationwide consumer class action accusing Toyota Motor Corp. of creating Highlander model SUVs with defective drive shafts and knowingly concealing the issue, but gave the proposed class a chance to amend its complaint.
Former employees of the country's largest Coca-Cola bottler have hit the company, its board and its benefits committee with a proposed class action in North Carolina federal court, alleging they mismanaged their retirement portfolio and participated in a "glaring breach" of their fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
A New York federal judge certified a nationwide class of nearly 8,000 retirement plans covering more than 200,000 participants in a lawsuit alleging the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association unlawfully profited from its retirement loan program, appointing Berger Montague PC and Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP class counsel.
United Behavioral Health is fighting a first-of-its-kind court order to reprocess 67,000 claims after a judge nixed the insurer's guidelines for covering behavioral health treatment, in a case that has huge implications for the future of Employee Retirement Income Security Act class actions over treatment denials.
Walgreens and a class of workers have received a California federal judge's approval for their $4.5 million settlement to resolve claims that the pharmacy chain broke Golden State labor law by not paying all wages to employees at its distribution centers.
Denmark's government urged a Manhattan federal judge not to toss its enhanced $2.1 billion tax refund fraud suit, arguing the claims are timely and that counterclaims should be rejected on the same grounds the court denied an initial dismissal bid.
More than 1.5 million Illinois Facebook users are seeking to claim a share of a proposed $650 million deal to resolve biometric privacy claims brought against the social media company in California federal court, according to a Wednesday filing by counsel for the parties, who had previously said that roughly 6 million consumers were eligible to participate in the settlement.
Baker Botts LLP has picked up its first West Coast-based Employee Retirement Income Security Act expert, adding a veteran ERISA litigator from Jenner & Block LLP to its ranks in San Francisco.
Morrison & Foerster LLP has fired off a final effort to shut down allegations that the firm discriminates against mothers before the claims wind up before a jury, insisting that the two accusers remaining in the litigation ignore the facts and rely on "self-righteous say-so."
A group of drivers led by a siding business is hitting General Motors LLC with a proposed class action alleging that it knowingly sold vehicles with engines "engineered to fail" through a defective oil system.
Parents who bought infant fever medication made by Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. are suing the company in California federal court, alleging in a proposed class action that the drugs are the same dosage and formula as the medication labeled for children, but at nearly double the price.
A Texas personal injury firm has resolved a dispute with a former attorney it accused of poaching 50 mass tort litigation clients after she was fired for what the firm says was bad performance, just weeks after the fight hit the courts.
A pipefitters' union struck a $3 million deal to end a long-running class action brought in Chicago federal court by Black workers who were allegedly boxed out of quality job opportunities.
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday trimmed several counts from a proposed class action against Subaru over alleged spontaneously cracking windshields but left most counts intact, ruling the consumers can sue over vehicle models they have not owned or leased.
The Second Circuit has overturned a decision in a derivative securities suit ordering a hedge fund with a stake in 1-800-Flowers to cough up the $4.9 million it earned buying and selling company stock, finding that questions remain over who controls the shares in the flower delivery retailer.
A New York federal judge wasn't happy with the amount of hours or law firms on the attorney fee bill she received in the wake of a $187 million deal with JPMorgan and other major financial institutions over claims of interbank rate rigging, but on Tuesday she granted $45 million in fees anyway.
Chinese coffeehouse chain Luckin Coffee and its underwriters filed dual motions Monday asking a New York federal judge to dismiss shareholder class action claims that their negligence and misinformation caused the company's stock to plunge following news of hundreds of millions of dollars in fabricated sales.
Pointing to "overly aggressive" efforts by Gilead Sciences Inc. to shut down demands for records as part of stockholder investigations into potential company malfeasance over its AIDS drug, a Delaware vice chancellor has ordered the company to cooperate and authorized investors to seek shifting their legal fees to the company, saying Gilead's conduct "epitomizes a trend."
Three former NFL players hit the league's retirement and disability benefits plans with a proposed class action alleging the retirement plan unlawfully shifted benefits between the plans, a move that set up the league and the players union's controversial agreement to cut disability benefits for potentially hundreds of retired players in the labor agreement reached earlier this year.
DaVita subsidiaries denied workers premium pay after the Trump administration declared a public health emergency in response to the novel coronavirus, despite a written policy to pay enhanced wages during a declared emergency, according to a proposed class action removed to Washington state federal court.
Many organizations are making plans for executives to go into government jobs, or for government officials to join a private sector team, but they must understand the many ethics rules that can put a damper on just how valuable the former employee or new hire can be, say Scott Thomas and Jennifer Carrier at Blank Rome.
In light of a 270% increase in data breaches this year, and the attendant class actions, in-house counsel can prepare to efficiently manage litigation by focusing on certain initial steps, ranging from multidistrict litigation strategy to insurance best practices, say David McDowell and Nancy Thomas at MoFo.
Perhaps one of the most significant health insurance decisions ever, a California federal court’s recent ruling that Employee Retirement Income Security Act violations require a UnitedHealth subsidiary to reconsider 50,000 denied mental health treatment claims reveals how insurers' decisions sometimes disregard generally accepted care standards, says Mark DeBofsky at DeBofsky Sherman.
As the pandemic brings a variety of legal stresses for businesses, lawyers must understand the emotional dynamic of a crisis and the particular energy it produces to effectively fulfill their role as advisers, say Meredith Parfet and Aaron Solomon at Ravenyard Group.
A new law in New York that requires businesses to obtain consumer consent for automatic contract renewals could warrant extensive revisions to existing terms and conditions, and courts could eventually create a private right of action if they follow California’s trend of permitting individuals to sue under separate statutes, say attorneys at Faegre Drinker.
Richard Finkelman and Yihua Astle at Berkeley Research Group discuss the ethical and bias concerns law firms must address when implementing artificial intelligence-powered applications for recruiting, conflict identification and client counseling.
Baca v. Johnson & Johnson, a recent pelvic mesh lawsuit brought in Arizona federal court, is a perfect example of how some product liability cases that might be accepted in a multidistrict litigation contain deficiencies that cannot withstand scrutiny when tried individually, says Rachel Weil at Reed Smith.
Attorneys should consider the pros and cons of participating in virtual court proceedings from home versus their law firm offices, and whether they have the right audio, video and team communication tools for their particular setup, say attorneys at Arnold & Porter.
Schools facing lawsuits associated with both shutting down and reopening amid the COVID-19 pandemic may be able to find relief through their consumer general liability and educators legal liability insurance policies, says Michael Rush at Gilbert.
Attorneys considering blowing the whistle on False Claims Act violations by recipients of COVID-19 relief may face a number of ethical constraints on their ability to disclose client information and file qui tam actions, say Breon Peace and Jennifer Kennedy Park at Cleary.
U.S. Supreme Court nominees typically face intense questioning over potential judicial activism, but a better way to gauge judges' activist tendencies may be to look at the footnotes in their opinions, say Christopher Collier at Hawkins Parnell and Michael Arndt at Rohan Law.
Although a recent Law360 guest article claimed that confusion has seeped into decisions concerning insurance coverage for opioid lawsuits, courts have addressed the issue clearly and consistently in holding that commercial general liability policies cover the defense of such cases, say attorneys at Miller Friel.
The pandemic has accelerated the need to improve the practice of law through technology, but law firms and in-house legal departments must first ensure they have employee buy-in and well-defined processes for new digital tools, say Dan Broderick at BlackBoiler and Daryl Shetterly at Orrick.
Brian Burlant at Major Lindsey looks at how pandemic-era remote work has changed the way law firms operate — from shifts in secretarial functions to associate professional development — and explains why some alterations may be here to stay.
A North Carolina state court and Mississippi federal court recently reached opposing conclusions in COVID-19 insurance coverage lawsuits despite analyzing similar business interruption policy language, likely encouraging further litigation over unsettled coverage questions, says Mark Binsky at Abrams Gorelick.