There's no argle-bargle in Judge Brett Kavanaugh's opinions. Instead, he's made a name for himself on the D.C. Circuit with clear, concise writing.
Being a lawyer is not easy. But among private practice attorneys, in-house counsel and government lawyers, who's feeling the greatest pressure in finances and stress? Law360's 2018 Lawyer Satisfaction Survey provides a snapshot. Check back throughout the week for our full report on lawyers' job satisfaction and lifestyle.
Law360's 2018 Lawyer Satisfaction Survey shows that when it comes to career and overall well-being, one type of firm is a lawyer's happy place — at least relatively speaking. Check back throughout the week for our full report on lawyers' job satisfaction and lifestyle.
Supreme Court nominee D.C. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh once questioned the Supreme Court’s decision forcing President Richard Nixon to hand over taped conversations about the coverup of the Watergate burglary, according to documents released by the Senate over the weekend.
In a partial dissent from a decision handing Google, Apple, AOL and Yahoo a win in a patent infringement suit, a Federal Circuit judge on Friday slammed the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice decision, expressing frustration with its definitions of “abstract ideas” and “inventive concepts.”
A Texas appeals court on Thursday ordered a trial court to dial back its overbroad discovery order against Toyota in a suit launched by the parents of two children who were injured by front seats in a Lexus that collapsed backward in a rear-end collision.
A split D.C. Circuit panel reversed a lower court’s ruling that a federal statute governing Amtrak’s regulatory authority over its competitors was unconstitutional, saying that by severing an arbitration clause in the statute, Amtrak’s regulatory proposals could be overruled by a federal transportation agency.
In a brief filed before the full Seventh Circuit reconsiders whether to uphold a national injunction barring the Trump administration from imposing new, immigration-focused grant conditions, the U.S. Department of Justice argued that the court should have limited the injunction to Chicago.
The D.C. Circuit on Friday upheld a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rule for so-called “exceptional events,” like wildfires and volcanic eruptions, rejecting environmental advocates’ contention that the rule would let the agency write off human-caused pollution as natural activity.
The D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission wrongly allowed Powertech to keep a uranium mining license after failing to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act over objections from the Oglala Sioux Tribe, holding that such a decision “vitiates” the environmental law’s requirements.
The Second Circuit said Friday that a Jamaican immigrant convicted of a New York state marijuana charge should not be classified as an aggravated felon under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
A woman whose cancer-stricken mother won a $417 million jury verdict saying Johnson & Johnson's talcum baby powder caused her ovarian cancer has appealed a California judge’s “about-face” decision to vacate the award, arguing in a brief Wednesday that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding.
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh did not participate in two opinions handed down Friday by the D.C. Circuit in cases he sat through last fall, suggesting there are no more forthcoming decisions from him while he is being considered by the Senate as Justice Anthony Kennedy’s replacement.
A New Jersey man cannot pursue a legal malpractice claim against his onetime business partner’s attorney over an allegedly bogus real estate transaction because they did not have an attorney-client relationship and the lawyer did not breach a fiduciary duty owed to him, a state appeals court ruled Friday.
A Pennsylvania state appeals panel on Thursday affirmed dismissal of a suit alleging ice company Arctic Glacier USA fired a worker after reneging on a promise to give him time to pass a drug test, saying he botched transferring his wrongful termination claim from federal court.
The Washington Supreme Court has ruled that the Port of Seattle need only pay $10 million to an injured airport baggage handler, rejecting the worker's claim that the port should be on the hook for the entirety of a jury’s $40 million award.
The D.C. Circuit on Friday reversed the dismissal of certain terrorism liability claims against Hezbollah and an Iranian bank related to rocket attacks against Israel, saying a district court failed to address necessary jurisdictional issues before ruling, but affirmed the dismissal of tort claims against the bank, citing a recent high court decision.
A California state appeals court on Thursday found that a Los Angeles County assessor can include revenue from Time Warner Cable Inc.’s broadband and telephone services in valuing the right to use the public rights-of-ways for the purposes of property taxes, partially reversing a trial court ruling over a $10 million property tax refund.
The Fourth Circuit on Friday sided with a small West Virginia refinery and threw out the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s rejection of the company’s application for an exemption to the renewable fuel standard program, saying that the decision had wrongly relied on a faulty economic hardship analysis.
The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has asked the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider its position that one of its members should be taxed on funds intended for her husband and children, saying that the ruling, if applied to other members, would increase the tribe’s tax withholding obligations by about $3.4 million annually.
The Federal Circuit on Friday revived a former U.S. Secret Service special agent’s proposed wage-and-hour class action alleging that he and other agents were shorted on overtime, saying the Office of Personnel Management improperly required that certain hours be worked consecutively to trigger overtime.
The latest term ended with a bang with Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement, but the cases themselves packed a punch this term. With the Supreme Court back at full strength, the docket was loaded with issues that divided the nine justices. Here, Law360 takes a look at the oddest voting lineups, the juiciest dissents and the best oral argument moments from a contentious session.
With more judicial vacancies at the start of his term than any president in the past three decades, President Donald Trump has an unusual opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary. Here is Law360's comprehensive guide to the nominations.
In a series of exclusive interviews with Law360, current and former Supreme Court justices discussed topics as varied as the president’s wartime powers, their own decision-making process, the confirmation of the court’s newest member, and the void left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
As we saw with the outcry over Yale Law School's statement about U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, too many in the liberal legal profession still cling to an old view of the rules and norms. Their reputations are now being weaponized on behalf of a judge who has questioned a president's accountability to legal constraints, says Neera Tanden, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress.
A California appellate court's decision in Benaroya v. Bruce Willis is one of several recent decisions teaching that if you want the ability to arbitrate against the key individuals in your counterparty, those individuals should be signatories to the arbitration clause in the underlying deal documents, say Michael Cypers and Michael Gerst of Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP.
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc. will cause a massive shift of risk onto remote sellers in the form of state audits, litigation in hostile forums, and state False Claims Act and consumer fraud lawsuits, say attorneys at Jones Day.
A New Jersey state appellate court's decision in Jimenez v. Jimenez shows that when dealing with property owned by a husband and wife as tenants by the entirety, New Jersey law can impose very serious ramifications on a judgment creditor’s efforts to collect or levy on that property, says Bruce Buechler of Lowenstein Sandler LLP.
The misappropriation of funds charge can leave defense attorneys struggling throughout trial to distinguish personal expenses from legitimate business expenses. The Fifth Circuit's decision in U.S. v. Spalding sheds light on how to handle these situations, but also sets out the battles that attorneys won’t win, say Kip Mendrygal and Mario Nguyen of Locke Lord LLP.
Less than three weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, President Donald Trump signed an executive order applying the court’s rationale in Lucia to the hiring — and firing — of all administrative law judges in the federal government, making them entirely beholden to the heads of their agencies or the president for their jobs, says Brian Casey of Barnes & Thornburg LLP.
On July 6, the D.C. Circuit torpedoed a hydroelectric license renewal issued in 2013 because the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not consider environmental damage already caused by the project. In doing so, the court rejected FERC’s long-standing practice of using existing conditions and operations as an environmental baseline, say attorneys at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
Next term, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear six cases that might impact insurers, reinsurers and other financial services institutions. These cases will address asbestos, immunity and exemption, class action and arbitration issues, say Mark Bradford and Damon Vocke of Duane Morris LLP.
While Senate hearings on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court will draw much attention during July, Congress remains very busy with fiscal year 2019 appropriations bills. The chambers may go to conference this month on the first of several appropriations "minibuses," says Layth Elhassani of Covington & Burling LLP.
People with certain personality traits tend to use certain words. A computer analysis of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s D.C. Circuit opinions reveals that he is highly extraverted, which means that he would be a prominent voice on the U.S. Supreme Court, says Matthew Hall, a professor at the University of Notre Dame.