Planned Parenthood failed to properly fight off a free speech challenge to its suit over secretly recorded videos purporting to show the improper sale of fetal tissue, anti-abortion activists told a Ninth Circuit panel Friday, saying a lower court erred in finding in favor of the health care provider.
The Seventh Circuit on Friday affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a suit brought by the union representing Union Pacific Railroad Co. workers and send the dispute over the railroad's modification of disciplinary rules to arbitration instead.
The Tenth Circuit on Friday rejected an objector’s challenge to a $38 million settlement that ended a derivative suit against the directors of an energy company that went bankrupt while the case was pending, saying he lost the right to sue when the company’s shares were canceled.
West Virginia’s high court on Friday affirmed the toss of a medical malpractice suit alleging that a doctor injured a patient during a hysterectomy, finding that the lower court rightly determined the suit was time-barred.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 10 automobile dealer trade groups and two business and retail trade groups have filed amicus briefs supporting a California Mercedes-Benz dealership’s U.S. Supreme Court petition that employees who advise customers about repair work are exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The Federal Circuit’s recent rash of reversals at the U.S. Supreme Court isn’t cause for worry, according to Federal Circuit Judge Alan D. Lourie, who said Friday they’re a sign of reasonable differences in high-stakes cases.
The D.C. Circuit on Friday rejected a former Washington, D.C., Department of Corrections employee’s bid to reopen a suit alleging he was retaliated against for participating in a sexual harassment class action years earlier and fired for complaining about various adverse actions taken against him.
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday decided to end a case asking when the clock begins to run on a personal injury claim stemming from an allegedly defective product, after the plaintiff in a Johnson & Johnson unit pelvic mesh suit dropped her connected Eleventh Circuit appeal.
Amtrak has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether the Surface Transportation Board has authority to define an “on-time” passenger train when investigating railroads for delays, saying a recent void in the law jeopardizes Amtrak’s longstanding right of way over cargo traffic on railways.
The New Jersey Appellate Division on Friday revived a former school employee's suit alleging that she was on a town mayor's so-called hit list and fired in retaliation for not lending him political support, ruling that she presented sufficient evidence to go before a jury.
A former tenured professor of the University of Texas has asked the Supreme Court to revive his case against the university, saying the decision to void his tenure and not hire him on after the university merged with another violated his constitutional rights.
The Fourth Circuit on Friday reinstated Fair Labor Standards Act claims in a suit against Schmidt Baking Co. Inc. from former employees alleging they were entitled to overtime pay, reversing a lower court’s dismissal.
A bank argued Friday that Baron & Budd PC, Carter Wolden Curtis LLP and Golomb & Honik PC couldn’t legally prosecute, on behalf of a district attorney, allegations it tricked customers into buying credit card protection plans, prompting a Ninth Circuit panel to note that private individuals prosecute public matters all the time.
A Pennsylvania appeals court on Friday said it would not throw out a preliminary injunction aimed at enforcing the noncompete provision in an ex-Tyco Fire Products LP sales manager’s employment agreement after he left the company to join a competitor.
A taxpayer petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit decision upholding a district court’s rejection of his motion to recover nearly $600,000 in attorneys' fees, even though he prevailed on the merits of the underlying case.
President Donald J. Trump announced on Friday the addition of five new names to the list of judges that he will draw upon to fill a potential vacancy in the U.S. Supreme Court.
A split California appeals court ruled Thursday that a San Diego regional planning agency failed to properly analyze greenhouse gas reduction and assess public health risks in a 2011 review of a $200 billion long-term transportation plan.
Fifteen states and the District of Columbia urged the Fourth Circuit to preserve a Maryland federal court’s block on President Donald Trump’s travel ban preventing nationals of several predominantly Muslim countries from entering the U.S., saying the restrictions hurt tourism and recruitment of international talent.
An Indiana appellate court panel on Friday revived a suit against an obstetrician-gynecologist accused of not warning a pregnant mother about the risk of serious complications during delivery, resulting in permanent nerve damage to her son.
A New Jersey state appeals court on Friday upended a ruling that dismissed a legal malpractice action as being filed too late, finding that the record is unclear as to when a construction worker allegedly knew he had been harmed by his former lawyer in litigation over a job-related injury.
With more judicial vacancies at the start of his term than any president in the past three decades, President Donald Trump has an unusual opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary. Here is Law360's comprehensive guide to the nominations.
In a series of exclusive interviews with Law360, current and former Supreme Court justices discussed topics as varied as the president’s wartime powers, their own decision-making process, the confirmation of the court’s newest member, and the void left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
Courts have consistently held that social media accounts are subject to established discovery principles but are reluctant to allow parties to rummage through private social media accounts. Recent case law confirms that narrowly tailored information requests get the best results, say Matthew Hamilton, Donna Fisher and Jessica Bae of Pepper Hamilton LLP.
It seems at first glance that the U.S. Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in Oil States v. Greene's on the constitutionality of inter partes review could cement the fate of the U.S. International Trade Commission as well. But there are two important distinctions between the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the ITC, say Lisa Kattan and Lauren Dreyer of Baker Botts LLP.
When a catastrophe strikes and insurance companies either deny coverage or limit the coverage provided, the insurance broker is in the crosshairs of what can turn out to be a litigious claim. Gary Strong of Seiger Gfeller & Laurie LLP explores the duty of insurance brokers in New Jersey and how these duties come into play, particularly after Superstorm Sandy.
Appellate lawyers are usually silent observers at trial who collaborate on legal strategy, conduct research during court breaks, and craft jury instructions, verdict forms and major motions. But as I discovered in one trial, this is not always the case, says M.C. Sungaila of Haynes and Boone LLP.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s persuasive brief in SAS Institute v. Matal — set for oral argument on Nov. 27 — suggests this inter partes review case may improve the government’s winning percentage at the U.S. Supreme Court, says Jason Nolan of Duane Morris LLP.
Jeh Johnson, the former secretary of homeland security, was kind enough to let me visit him to reflect on his diverse career. He told stories that left me speechless. And yes, the man who was responsible for the Transportation Security Administration removed his shoes when going through airport security. You bet I asked, says Randy Maniloff of White and Williams LLP.
In appealing a decision that invalidated the Obama administration’s overtime rules, it seems the U.S. Department of Labor wants to affirm its authority to utilize a salary threshold for Fair Labor Standards Act exemptions, say Dale Hudson and Jeffrey League of Nixon Peabody LLP.
While Alexander Hamilton is the subject of a hit Broadway musical and renewed biographical examinations, professor Kate Brown takes us down a road less traveled in her book "Alexander Hamilton and the Development of American Law" — showing Hamilton as first, last and foremost an American lawyer, says U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently held that the state’s flat $3 million cap on net operating loss carryforwards violates the state constitution’s uniformity clause. While the court’s reasoning is based upon the application of a Pennsylvania constitutional provision, it may be applicable to other states that have net operating loss carryforward caps, say attorneys with Eversheds Sutherland LLP.
There are at least four reasons supporting the need for some form of a mediation group within a law firm, especially in firms with larger practices, according to Dennis Klein, owner of Critical Matter Mediation and former litigation partner at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.