A California appeals court on Friday reversed nearly half of the corruption charges against a former Bell, California, city official convicted for a scheme to fleece the working-class city for millions of dollars, citing erroneous jury instructions.
The Federal Circuit sided with T-Mobile on Friday after the wireless carrier fended off a $100 million infringement lawsuit by Prism Technologies LLC at trial, and it went further than the lower court by invalidating Prism’s authentication server patents as noninventive, abstract ideas under Alice.
General Motors LLC has agreed to a private, confidential settlement that could resolve hundreds of claims against the automaker over an allegedly defective ignition switch, GM’s lawyers said in a letter to the New York federal judge overseeing the multidistrict litigation.
A suburban Philadelphia businessman and star government witness in the federal corruption case against Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams conceded under cross-examination Friday that several years of lavish gifts to his “friend” yielded no relief on his most pressing problems.
Two Baker McKenzie tax attorneys and a trial lawyer are representing a Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group in a new lawsuit filed Thursday alleging that President Donald Trump and his staff are failing to preserve statutorily mandated records through their use of messaging apps and social media platforms.
Sears Holdings Corp. and Apex Tool Group LLC asked an Illinois federal judge Thursday to overturn a jury’s $6 million patent verdict against them, claiming the jury made an emotion-fueled decision unmoored by the law.
The politically connected head of a Philadelphia nonprofit mental health clinic was convicted on federal charges on Friday for misappropriating what prosecutors claim may have been up to $1 million in funds from the facility.
Robert Schulman, the former Hunton & Williams LLP patent lawyer convicted of insider trading on a Pfizer deal, has tapped a Proskauer Rose LLP appellate partner for his post-verdict defense, a Thursday filing said.
Federal prosecutors told a Massachusetts federal judge that a pharmacist convicted of racketeering for his role in the deadly 2012 meningitis outbreak deserves to be jailed for 35 years, a sentence the government says is merited by the enormous human devastation that he left in his wake.
A Kansas federal jury awarded corn producers $218 million Friday in the first trial in multidistrict litigation over agricultural giant Syngenta’s alleged role in China’s rejection of U.S. corn shipments.
A federal prosecutor on Thursday told a New York federal judge that a relative of former pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli had contacted a witness and implied they should not testify, while Shkreli's lawyers warned that the government may be scaring off defense witnesses from the securities fraud trial.
Representatives from several of the country’s largest ground beef makers testified for a South Dakota jury Thursday that they had to stop using Beef Products Inc.’s beef trimmings product because of the public outcry caused by ABC reporting calling it “pink slime.”
A Georgia federal judge ordered an insurance broker who made $500,000 from a tip about a Sanofi-Aventis SA acquisition to pay $1.6 million in disgorgement and penalties on Thursday, saying his “greed was overwhelming” but did not justify the maximum penalty of triple his profits.
Federal prosecutors on Friday showed jurors in the fraud trial of ex-American Realty Capital Properties Chief Financial Officer Brian S. Block a salary schedule that would grant him eight times his $500,000 salary in cash and equity as a bonus that depended in part on the value of a key earnings metric with which he is accused of fiddling.
The PGA Tour on Wednesday urged a New York state judge to rehear its arguments that a lawsuit by professional golfer Vijay Singh over a suspension for using a purportedly illicit, deer-antler-derived spray should not go to trial, arguing that Singh has not actually raised any admissible evidence to show the suspension caused him a specific harm.
A boat company won a $2.7 million verdict in a patent suit against Brunswick Corp. after Brunswick failed in its quest to move the suit from Virginia to Tennessee after the U.S. Supreme Court’s TC Heartland decision, according to a verdict form filed Wednesday.
A federal judge in Massachusetts on Thursday declined to toss the racketeering and mail fraud convictions of a pharmacist whose company, the New England Compounding Center, was linked to the deadly 2012 meningitis outbreak.
A suburban Philadelphia businessman described using lavish gifts — from a $3,000 custom sofa to an all-expenses-paid trip to the Dominican Republic — to cultivate a friendship with Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, as testimony in the latter’s federal corruption trial that continued Thursday.
The Illinois federal judge overseeing multidistrict litigation against manufacturers of testosterone replacement therapy drugs on Thursday selected the first two cases that will go to trial against Eli Lilly and Co.
Two Florida mental health counselors convicted of conspiracy for their roles in a $63 million Medicare and Medicaid fraud and kickback scheme will not get a new trial, an Eleventh Circuit panel ruled Wednesday, saying that the jury had enough evidence to reach its verdict.
Despite legal education training and the focus on logic and reason by the courts, lawyers address emotional issues on a daily basis — albeit more indirectly. But a shift to consciously and strategically addressing emotions gives us a powerful tool to help our clients reach faster, better decisions, say dispute resolution experts Robert Creo and Selina Shultz.
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide whether to hear a case concerning a medical device maker's right to introduce the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s review and authorization of its product into evidence. Such information should be a legitimate part of companies' full and robust defenses of their products, say Lisa Dwyer of King & Spalding LLP and Matthew Wetzel of AdvaMed.
In DuPont, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the first federal jury conviction for charges arising under the Economic Espionage Act and potentially catalyzed more aggressive economic espionage and trade secret enforcement, say Joseph Fazioli and James Bobseine of Dechert LLP.
The guessing game around Justice Anthony Kennedy’s possible retirement is reaching a crescendo. Yet the speculation does more than fuel bookmakers’ odds. It draws attention to his pivotal role as the court’s swing vote, says Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California reaffirmed a causation requirement between a plaintiff’s claims and the defendant’s in-state conduct. After this ruling, the test for specific personal jurisdiction is simple: File suit where the defendant did something significant that caused the claim to arise, say attorneys with Morrison & Foerster LLP.
Statutory damages guarantee a minimum recovery in each individual case where a violation may cause only nominal damage. But aggregated statutory damages in class actions can create a risk of staggeringly large awards, which may not be tax-deductible. Companies must know the law and take steps to minimize tax consequences, says Peter Robbins of Corbett & Robbins LLP.
One way to combat juror confusion and boredom is to allow jurors to ask witnesses questions. No federal evidentiary or court rule prohibits it, and every federal circuit court to address the practice has held it permissible, say Stephen Susman, Richard Lorren Jolly and Dr. Roy Futterman of the NYU School of Law Civil Jury Project.
A trio of rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court has made this a difficult spring for forum-shopping lawyers. TC Heartland, BNSF Railway and now Bristol-Myers Squibb have enforced limits on exercise of personal jurisdiction over corporate defendants, sending an unmistakable message to lower courts, says Lawrence Ebner of Capital Appellate Advocacy PLLC.
The immediate effects of imposing a five-year statute of limitations on SEC disgorgement claims may be limited. A far more intriguing element of the Kokesh opinion is found in a footnote, which brings opportunities for real damage to the SEC’s toolbox, say attorneys with Walden Macht & Haran LLP.
Since the California Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in Howell v. Hamilton Meats, the case has significantly shaped the litigation landscape, including many high-profile opinions and jury verdicts in its aftermath. It also has significant implications for the Affordable Care Act and plaintiffs’ litigation strategy, says Robert Tyson Jr. of Tyson & Mendes LLP.