Justices Skip Case Over 'Per Se' Rule In Antitrust Convictions

By Anne Cullen · January 13, 2020, 5:27 PM EST

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to review criminal antitrust convictions handed down against three California residents for bid-rigging, despite arguments from criminal justice nonprofits that the way federal prosecutors went...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Case Information

Case Title

Javier Sanchez, Gregory Casorso, and Michael Marr, Petitioners v. United States

Case Number

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

Date Filed

September 04, 2019

Recent Articles By Anne

July 30, 2021
5th Circ. Judge Assails Disparate Impact In Race Bias Case
October 28, 2020
HUD Accused Of Firing Muslim Worker Due To Religious Bias
October 23, 2020
Developer, Union Reach Truce To End 'Saliva-Spewing' Pickets
October 20, 2020
NYC Developer Sues Union Over 'Saliva-Spewing' Pickets
September 15, 2020
Mortgage Lenders' Team Leaders Not Exempt From OT
July 10, 2020
WeWork Facing Another Suit Claiming Hostile, Biased Culture
May 27, 2020
Nonprofit Battelle Says Ex-Employee's FCA Suit Is Hollow
February 18, 2020
11th Circ. Pressed To Reconsider Shrinking TCPA's Reach
February 12, 2020
FTC Targeted Sanctuary Belize To Punish Founder, Judge Told
February 11, 2020
Sanctuary Belize Judge Mulling Criminal Case Against Execs