H AND L FARMS LLC et al v. SILICON RANCH CORPORATION et al

  1. May 03, 2023

    Solar Farm Trial Victors Aim To Close Exits For $135M Liability

    A Georgia couple who won $135.5 million at trial against the owner and developers of a neighboring solar farm powering a Facebook data center have asked a Georgia federal judge to prevent the companies from trying to derail the judgment by entering liability findings against them.

  2. April 11, 2023

    Ga. Judge Refuses To Exclude Claims In Solar Farm Fight

    As a trial was set to kick off on Tuesday, a Georgia federal judge denied a motion by the owners and developers of the Lumpkin Solar Farm to exclude a negligence per se claim by neighbors who allege that poor site management and inadequate erosion controls at the facility heavily damaged their property with sediment-laden runoff.

  3. January 17, 2023

    Judge Won't Grant Partial Wins In Solar Farm Erosion Fight

    A Georgia federal judge has refused to grant summary judgment wins to the owners and developers of Lumpkin Solar Farm or to the neighbors who allege that shoddy site management has polluted their property and lake with sediment-laden runoff.

  4. November 16, 2022

    Fight Heats Up Over Ga. Solar Farm Erosion Liability

    The owners and partners of Georgia-based Lumpkin Solar Farm fired back at claims shoddy management is to blame for the 1,238 cubic yards of eroded sediment that allegedly washed off-site and polluted a nearby property and lake, saying there are disputed facts that should be decided by a jury.

  5. October 17, 2022

    Solar Farm, Neighbors Seek Rulings In Erosion Dispute

    Neighbors of the Lumpkin Solar Farm have asked a Georgia federal judge to find its owners and partners liable for trespass, alleging that shoddy management has caused at least 1,238 cubic yards of eroded sediment to wash off-site and pollute their property and lake.

  6. July 11, 2022

    Solar Farm Wants Attorney Cut From Property Damage Suit

    The owners of a Georgia solar power farm are asking a federal judge to remove an opposing attorney in a property dispute stemming from the construction of their facility near a former forest reserve, claiming he has a conflict of interest.