Stanley Battat, et ux., Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Track this case

Case Number:

25-719

Court:

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit:

Agency 

Firms

  1. April 27, 2026

    Justices Won't Hear Couple's IRS Penalty Approval Fight

    The U.S. Supreme Court denied a couple's challenge to a $345,000 penalty against them Monday, preserving an Eleventh Circuit decision rejecting their argument that the IRS didn't get sufficient supervisory approval for the penalty.

  2. April 06, 2026

    IRS Gets Penalty Approval Wrong, Justices Told

    The Internal Revenue Service has improperly interpreted a requirement that an agency supervisor must approve tax penalties before they're asserted against a taxpayer, a couple told the U.S. Supreme Court, urging it to overturn an Eleventh Circuit decision slapping them with $345,000 in accuracy-related penalties.

  3. March 24, 2026

    Tax Penalties Didn't Need Early Approval, Justices Told

    A lower-ranking IRS agent was allowed to tell a couple, before getting her supervisor's approval, that she recommended they pay tax penalties, the federal government told the U.S. Supreme Court in urging it to uphold the Eleventh Circuit's reading of a supervisor sign-off requirement.