Pryor v. Jaffe & Asher LLP et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:13-cv-04558

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Fair Standards

Judge:

James C. Francis

Firms

Sectors & Industries:

  1. July 07, 2015

    Jaffe & Asher Settles Ex-Worker's Sexual Harassment Claims

    A federal magistrate judge signed off Monday on a settlement agreement between law firm Jaffe & Asher LLP and a former employee over allegations that a former information technology director forcibly kissed her on the neck in a bar.

  2. April 21, 2015

    Jaffe & Asher Can't Escape Sexual Harassment Case

    Jaffe & Asher LLP faces a sexual harassment trial in June after a New York federal judge on Tuesday refused to dismiss allegations that a former information technology director forcibly kissed a female subordinate at a bar.

  3. September 16, 2014

    Jaffe & Asher Denies Ex-Worker's Sexual Harassment Claims

    A former Jaffe & Asher LLP employee lacks evidence that the firm's technology director sexually harassed her by making unwanted advances at a bar, an attorney representing the firm said in New York federal court Tuesday.

  4. June 13, 2014

    Jaffe & Asher Finances Off The Table In Discrimination Row

    Attorneys representing a former Jaffe & Asher LLP worker in a discrimination suit cannot seek information about the firm's finances in a deposition after a New York federal judge found Thursday that digging for such information was "needlessly intrusive" at this stage of the litigation.

  5. February 19, 2014

    Jaffe & Asher Employee's Sexual Harassment Claims Advance

    A New York federal judge on Wednesday nudged along a Jaffe & Asher LLP worker's discrimination suit against the firm, cautioning attorneys to expeditiously resolve any discovery disputes surrounding the alleged domestic violence and sexual harassment incidents central to the case.

  6. January 15, 2014

    Jaffe & Asher Loses Bid To Toss Sexual Harassment Claims

    A New York federal judge on Wednesday rejected Jaffe & Asher LLP's attempt to kick gender and domestic violence victim discrimination claims against the firm and its IT manager, ruling that the allegations were severe enough to survive a motion to dismiss.