Marcie Hamilton v. JUUL Labs, Inc.

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:20-cv-03710

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge:

Edward M. Chen

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 28, 2021

    Juul To Face Bulk Of Ex-Employee's NDA Whistleblower Suit

    Juul Labs Inc. must face the bulk of claims brought by a former manager alleging the electronic cigarette giant uses nondisclosure agreements to stifle whistleblowing, a California federal judge has ruled, finding that the ex-employee plausibly alleged that the NDAs are illegal.

  2. January 07, 2021

    Juul Not Likely To Escape Employee's Refreshed NDA Fight

    A California federal judge said during a hearing Thursday he's inclined to leave mostly intact an amended complaint brought by a former Juul Labs Inc. manager alleging the e-cigarette giant uses nondisclosure agreements to stifle whistleblowing, saying the ex-employee's second go-round is specific enough to survive dismissal.

  3. September 11, 2020

    Juul Beats 'Gag Order' Claims In NDA Fight

    A California federal judge has tossed the bulk of a former Juul Labs Inc. manager's case claiming the e-cigarette giant uses nondisclosure agreements to stifle whistleblowing, though he will allow the plaintiff to take another stab with documents she says prove her claims.

  4. June 05, 2020

    Ex-Juul Worker Says 'Terrorizing' NDA Blocks Whistleblowing

    A former manager at Juul Labs Inc. has sued the electronic cigarette maker in California federal court, claiming the company uses the "terrorizing effect" of non-disclosure agreements to tamp down whistleblowing just like traditional cigarette companies have done in the past.