Strategic Technology Institute v. NLRB

Track this case

Case Number:

22-2958

Court:

Appellate - 8th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

Agency 

Government Agencies

  1. January 22, 2024

    NLRB Asks Full 8th Circ. To Intercede After Panel OKs Firings

    The National Labor Relations Board on Monday urged the full Eighth Circuit to rethink a decision rejecting a board ruling that a U.S. Air Force contractor fired 17 workers to stifle union organizing, saying the panel flouted U.S. Supreme Court precedent by rejecting its fact findings.

  2. December 06, 2023

    8th Circ. Nixes NLRB Ruling On Air Force Contractor Firings

    The Eighth Circuit knocked the National Labor Relations Board's analysis of a U.S. Air Force contractor's termination of more than a dozen workers who discussed unionizing, saying in a decision Wednesday that evidence didn't support the board's findings of federal labor law violations.

  3. March 06, 2023

    Air Force Contractor Says Firings Not Linked To Union Activity

    A U.S. Air Force contractor encouraged the Eighth Circuit to scrap the National Labor Relations Board's finding that the company illegally fired 17 workers who discussed organizing, arguing board prosecutors didn't present enough evidence of company hostility toward unions to render the firings labor law violations.

  4. February 01, 2023

    NLRB Attys Urge 8th Circ. To Back Anti-Union Firing Order

    National Labor Relations Board attorneys told the Eighth Circuit to affirm the board's conclusions that a U.S. Air Force contractor illegally fired 17 workers who talked about unionization, arguing the board correctly relied on plenty of evidence showing the company's anti-union motives.

  5. December 13, 2022

    Contractor Asks 8th Circ. To Ax NLRB Anti-Union Firing Ruling

    A contractor for the U.S. Air Force asked the Eighth Circuit to overturn a National Labor Relations Board ruling that the company was motivated by anti-union feelings when it laid off unionizing workers, telling the court the board relied on suspicion rather than evidence to support its decision.