Discrimination

  • June 17, 2026

    EEOC Targets Harassment, Muldrow In 2026 Amicus Briefs

    So far in 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has used amicus briefs to push courts to adopt its views on employer liability in third-party harassment cases, as well as the breadth of the U.S. Supreme Court's Muldrow decision, which lowered the bar for workplace bias claims. Here's a look at where the agency is directing its amicus efforts this year.

  • June 17, 2026

    Walmart Hit With $23M Verdict For Wash. Worker Retaliation

    A Washington federal jury has found Walmart on the hook for retaliating against a former store employee who claimed she was fired for standing up for colleagues who were sexually harassed by another co-worker, awarding the plaintiff $23 million in damages.

  • June 17, 2026

    Real Estate Cos. Default In Native American Bias Suit

    Two real estate companies that own several upscale Detroit area apartment buildings have failed to respond to a federal lawsuit accusing managers of subjecting a Native American engineer to repeated racist remarks and stereotypes, according to a clerk of court's entry of default Tuesday.

  • June 17, 2026

    Alaska Airlines, Union Sued For Race Bias Over TikTok Firing

    Alaska Airlines weaponized its social media policy against a biracial female flight attendant who posted a TikTok dance in uniform while tolerating similar TikToks from white and male employees, a lawsuit in California federal court alleges, claiming the company wrongfully fired her and her union failed to adequately defend her.

  • June 17, 2026

    Kaiser Ends EEOC Religious Bias Probes Over Vaccine Policy

    Kaiser Permanente will pay $358,000 to settle U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigations into allegations that the healthcare consortium unlawfully denied employees religious exemptions from its vaccination policy, the federal agency announced Wednesday.

  • June 17, 2026

    Staffing Co. Wraps Up EEOC Sex Bias Suit With $150K Deal

    A staffing company has agreed to pay $150,000 to resolve a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sex bias suit claiming the business agreed to ensure it wouldn't send female applicants to an Alabama recycling plant for open laborer positions.

  • June 17, 2026

    Ex-Texas City Worker Gets $272K For Fees After $2M Ask

    A Texas federal judge said a former worker can collect attorney fees on claims that the City of Hutto illegally demanded he return $400,000 in separation pay, but cited his dismissed race allegations in awarding him far less than the $2 million in fees, interest and costs he sought.

  • June 17, 2026

    Berry Farm To Pay $550K In EEOC Sex Harassment Suit

    A berry grower will pay $550,000 to resolve a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit alleging it failed to stop managers, supervisors and other employees from making sexual comments about female workers, according to a filing in California federal court.

  • June 16, 2026

    CU Regents Ask Judge To Toss Black Board Member's Suit

    Members of the University of Colorado Board of Regents asked a federal judge to dismiss a fellow board member's lawsuit alleging she was sanctioned for opposing a university-funded campaign that stereotyped Black people, arguing that she was disciplined for breaching her fiduciary duties and that the defendant members have immunity.

  • June 16, 2026

    Citi Illegally Fired Risk Exec For Raising Issues, Suit Says

    Citigroup Inc. has been sued by a former senior risk management executive who alleged the bank fired her after she flagged risk deficiencies and identified problems with Citi's anti-money laundering risk management controls, and the bank has pushed back on her bid to proceed anonymously.

  • June 16, 2026

    Ex-Reed Smith Atty Seeks Appellate Review Of Bias Damages

    A former Reed Smith LLP attorney suing the firm for gender discrimination urged a state appeals court Tuesday to grant her bid to appeal a ruling on her available damages, arguing that the appeal is necessary to clarify a prior appellate decision.

  • June 16, 2026

    Staffing Cos. Say EEOC Suit Lacks Evidence Of Race Bias

    A trio of staffing companies urged a Tennessee federal court to toss a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission suit claiming they wouldn't hire Black workers upon clients' requests, arguing that despite developing a trove of discovery material the agency hasn't produced any evidence to support its claims.

  • June 16, 2026

    6th Circ. Won't Reopen Ohio Firefighter's Promotion Bias Suit

    The Sixth Circuit has backed the City of Cincinnati Fire Department's defeat of a firefighter's lawsuit claiming he was denied a promotion because he's Black, finding it was a low test score that cost him the promotion rather than race bias.

  • June 16, 2026

    6th Circ. Revives Superintendent's Suit Over Forced Leave

    The Sixth Circuit reopened a Michigan school superintendent's lawsuit alleging she was subjected to a sham misconduct investigation and involuntarily placed on leave because she's a woman who made unpopular decisions, ruling a trial court applied an improperly high standard when it refused to let her amend her complaint.

  • June 16, 2026

    EEOC Backs Negligence Standard For 3rd-Party Harassment

    The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission told the Second Circuit that a lower court was wrong to toss an ex-travel plaza worker's sex harassment suit, stating that just because the business didn't employ the alleged harasser doesn't mean it can't be held liable for failing to take action.

  • June 15, 2026

    Workday Position In AI Bias Suit May Boomerang, Judge Says

    A California federal judge pushed back Monday against Workday's "odd" claim that the state's civil rights laws don't apply in job bias litigation over its artificial intelligence tools, saying the California-based company's apparent argument would perversely subject it to "the laws of all 50 states and countries around the world."

  • June 15, 2026

    Univ. Of Washington Beats Medical Prof's Bias Suit At Trial

    Jurors have cleared the University of Washington's medical school of liability in an anesthesiology professor's lawsuit alleging that she was unfairly ousted from a director role after complaining of discrimination and harassment, finding that the professor failed to sufficiently prove any of her three claims against the school.

  • June 15, 2026

    DC, Fired ALJ Reach Settlement In Race Bias Suit

    The District of Columbia agreed to resolve a Black former administrative law judge's lawsuit alleging she was passed over for promotions in favor of less qualified white colleagues, according to a Monday filing in federal court.

  • June 15, 2026

    EEOC Strikes Tentative Deal To End Suit Over Ban On Beards

    The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and emergency services provider Global Medical Response told a Colorado federal court they've reached an agreement to resolve the agency's lawsuit alleging that the company's strict no-beard policy violated federal laws.

  • June 15, 2026

    Ex-Detroit Club Worker Tells Jury Owner Made Racist Remarks

    A former Detroit Club contractor told a federal jury Monday that the club's owner repeatedly made racist comments about job candidates, employees and potential customers, including calling one spa manager candidate "too Black" and referring to two Black hostesses with a racial slur involving the N-word.

  • June 15, 2026

    Meatpacking Cos. Can't Shake Haitian Workers' Bias Suit

    Haitian meatpacking workers who say they were lured to Colorado with false promises and subjected to race-based discrimination can proceed with their proposed class action, a federal judge recommended Friday, also denying a bid to strike class allegations.

  • June 15, 2026

    8th Circ. Revives ADA Suit From Nurse Who Refused Vaccine

    The Eighth Circuit reopened a lawsuit alleging a Minnesota healthcare system fired a nurse for asking to skip the COVID-19 vaccine because of chronic pain, ruling on Monday that the organization's assertion that the vaccination mandate was a core job requirement didn't make it so.

  • June 15, 2026

    Sex Bias Led To Unequal Pay, Firing, Says Ex-PNC Director

    A former managing director at Charlotte-based PNC Bank told a North Carolina federal court that the financial services giant targeted her for reporting sex-based discrimination, and then fired her right before the vesting of hundreds of thousands of dollars in restricted stock units.

  • June 15, 2026

    Ex-Apache Worker Asks For Discrimination Trial Redo

    A former Apache Corp. employee asked a Texas federal judge to undo a prior order granting her employer judgment as a matter of law midtrial, telling the court that her claims should have gone before a jury to decide.

  • June 15, 2026

    CBS News Denied Opportunities To Black Worker, Suit Says

    CBS News forced a Black associate director to move from New York to D.C. at her own expense, denied job opportunities to her and ultimately fired her for complaining about colleagues' harassment, she told a federal court Monday.

Expert Analysis

  • The Risks Of Employee Political Discourse On Social Media

    Author Photo

    As election season enters its final stretch and employees increasingly engage in political speech on social media, employers should beware the liability risks and consider policies that negotiate the line between employees' rights and the limits on those rights, say Bradford Kelley and James McGehee at Littler.

  • 7th Circ. Rulings Offer Employee Vaccine Exemption Guidance

    Author Photo

    Dawn Solowey and Samantha Brooks at Seyfarth explain how two recent Seventh Circuit rulings in Passarella v. Aspirus and Bube v. Aspirus could affect litigation involving employee vaccine exemptions, and discuss employer best practices for handling accommodation requests that include both religious and secular concerns.

  • Employers Should Not Neglect Paid Military Leave Compliance

    Author Photo

    An August decision from the Ninth Circuit and the settlement of a long-running class action, both examining paid leave requirements under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, are part of a nationwide trend that should prompt employers to review their military leave policies to avoid potential litigation and reputational damage, says Bradford Kelley at Littler.

  • Old Employment Law Principles Can Answer New AI Concerns

    Author Photo

    Despite growing legal and regulatory concerns about how artificial intelligence tools may affect employment decisions and worker rights, companies should take comfort in knowing that familiar principles of employment law and established compliance regimes can still largely address these new twists on old questions, say attorneys at Foley & Lardner.

  • NYC Wage Info Bill Highlights Rise In Pay Transparency Laws

    Author Photo

    With New York City the latest to mull requiring companies to annually report employee wage data, national employers should consider adapting their compliance practices to comply with increasingly common pay transparency and disclosure obligations at state and local levels, says Kelly Cardin at Littler Mendelson.

  • Workday AI Bias Suit Suggests Hiring Lessons For Employers

    Author Photo

    As state laws and a federal agency increasingly focus on employment bias introduced by artificial intelligence systems, a California federal court's recent decision to allow a discrimination suit to proceed against Workday's AI-driven recruitment software, shows companies should promptly assess these tools' risks, say attorneys at Williams & Connolly.

  • How Anti-DEI Bill Could Affect Employers' Diversity Efforts

    Author Photo

    Sen. J.D. Vance's recently introduced Dismantle DEI Act would substantially limit employers’ ability to implement and promote workplace diversity, equity and inclusion, but there are still steps employers can take to support a diverse workforce, says Peter Ennis at Cozen O’Connor.

  • US Labor And Employment Law Holds Some Harsh Trade-Offs

    Author Photo

    U.S. labor and employment laws have evolved into a product of exposure-capping compromise, which merits discussion in a presidential election year when the dialogue has focused on purported protections of middle-class workers, says Reuben Guttman at Guttman Buschner.

  • Water Cooler Talk: Immigration Insights From 'The Proposal'

    Author Photo

    Tracey Diamond and Evan Gibbs at Troutman Pepper chat with their colleague Robert Lee about how immigration challenges highlighted in the romantic comedy "The Proposal" — beyond a few farcical plot contrivances — relate to real-world visa processes and employer compliance.

  • Employers Face Uncertainty After Calif. Justices' Slur Ruling

    Author Photo

    In Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney's Office, the California Supreme Court recently ruled that a singular use of a racial slur may be sufficiently severe to support a hostile work environment claim, leaving employers to speculate about what sort of comments or conduct will meet this new standard going forward, says Stephanie Roeser at Manatt.

  • 9th Circ. Ruling Flags Work Harassment Risks Of Social Media

    Author Photo

    The recent Ninth Circuit ruling in Okonowsky v. Garland, holding an employer could be liable for a co-worker's harassing social media posts, highlights new challenges in technology-centered and remote workplaces, and underscores an employer's obligation to prevent hostile environments wherever their employees clock in, say Jennifer Lada and Phillip Schreiber at Holland & Knight.

  • Eye On Compliance: NY's New Freelance Protection Law

    Author Photo

    New York's Freelance Isn't Free Act is set to take effect later this month, meaning employers must be proactive in ensuring compliance and take steps to mitigate risks, such as updating documentation and specifying correct worker classification, says Jonathan Meer at Wilson Elser.

  • 3 Notes For Arbitration Agreements After Calif. Ruling

    Author Photo

    After last month's California Supreme Court decision in Ramirez v. Charter Communications invalidated several arbitration clauses in the company's employee contracts as unconscionable, companies should ensure their own arbitration agreements steer clear of three major pitfalls identified by the court, say attorneys at Cooley.