Ruilova et al v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:22-cv-00111
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 12, 2023
Yale Hospital Workers Get Early Nod For $1M ERISA Deal
A Connecticut federal judge gave his initial nod Monday to a proposed $1 million settlement between Yale-New Haven Hospital Inc. and a certified class of employees who accused it of letting their retirement savings go to excessive fees for its tax-sheltered annuity plan.
-
November 20, 2023
Yale Hospital Workers Present $1M Deal In Savings-Fees Suit
The class of Yale-New Haven Hospital Inc. workers who accused their employer of letting its $1.66 billion tax-sheltered annuity plan pay excessive fees at the cost of their retirement savings has asked a Connecticut federal judge to approve a $1 million settlement.
-
October 18, 2023
Yale Hospital Agrees To Settle ERISA Class Action Over Fees
Yale New Haven Hospital agreed to end a class action alleging it mismanaged its $1.66 billion retirement plan by failing to monitor its recordkeeper and allowing the plan to pay exorbitant fees, according to a filing in Connecticut federal court.
-
July 31, 2023
Class Certified In ERISA Suit Against Yale-New Haven Hospital
Yale-New Haven Hospital workers have won class certification in a Connecticut federal lawsuit alleging their retirement accounts were shortchanged through excessive fees, with Miller Shah LLP and Capozzi Adler PC appointed as class counsel.
-
June 30, 2023
Yale Hospital Agrees To ERISA Class Cert. In Fee Suit
Yale-New Haven Hospital Inc. has stipulated to the certification of a class of plaintiffs in an employee benefits lawsuit that accuses it of allowing its $1.66 billion retirement plan to pay excessive fees in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
-
March 02, 2023
Yale Hospital Must Face Trimmed ERISA Excessive Fee Suit
Yale-New Haven Hospital can't dodge a proposed class action claiming it allowed its $1.66 billion retirement plan to pay excessive fees in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a Connecticut federal judge said, finding employees have plausibly alleged that the hospital failed to monitor its record-keeper.