In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:14-md-02521
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- Jones Walker
- Freed Kanner
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Berman Tabacco
- Skadden Arps
- Levin Sedran
- Kohn Swift
- Hilliard & Shadowen
- Adler Pollock
- Girard Sharp
- Lockridge Grindal
- Krause Kalfayan
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Cohen Placitella
- Cohen Tauber
- Barrett Johnston
- Safirstein Law
- Odom & Des Roches
- DiCello Levitt
- Spector Roseman
- Heins Mills
- Plymale Law Firm
- Willig Williams
- Schnader Harrison
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Lite DePalma
- Wexler Boley
- Riley & Jacobson
- Heim Payne
- Husch Blackwell
- Hagens Berman
- Milberg Coleman
- Simmons Hanly
- Motley Rice
- Blank Rome
- Reed Smith
- Rawlings & Associates PLLC
- Brown Neri
- Squire Patton
- Arnold & Porter
- Dugan Law Firm
- Fox Rothschild
- Williams & Connolly
- Strauss Factor
- Hausfeld LLP
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Hangley Aronchick
- Garwin Gerstein
- NastLaw
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Taus Cebulash
- Radice Law Firm
- Cohen Milstein
- Neal & Harwell
- Robbins Geller
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Berger Montague
- DLA Piper
- Foley & Lardner
- Glancy Prongay
- Connolly Wells
- Baker Donelson
- Partridge Snow
- Winstead PC
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Labaton Keller
- Gunster Yoakley
Companies
- Teikoku Pharma USA Inc.
- Prime Therapeutics LLC
- Fraternal Order of Police
- CVS Health Corp.
- The Kroger Co.
- Endo International PLC
- Express Scripts Holding Co.
- International Association of Fire Fighters
- Government Employees Health Association Inc.
- Safeway Inc.
- Anda Inc.
- Allergan PLC
- Rochester Drug Cooperative Inc.
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
- OptumRx Inc.
- Optum Inc.
- Rite Aid Corp.
- H‑E‑B LP
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 21, 2017
Lidoderm Buyers, End Payors Win Cert. In Pay-For-Delay MDL
Purchasers of the Lidoderm pain patch won class certification in an antitrust multidistrict litigation against Endo Pharmaceuticals and others on Tuesday when a California federal judge found that both direct purchasers and end-payors proved common injuries with alleged delays of a generic version of the drug.
-
November 29, 2016
Lidoderm Buyers, Payors Near Cert. In Pay-For-Delay MDL
A California federal judge indicated Tuesday he's inclined to certify a putative class of indirect drug buyers and a class of end-payors in a pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation against Endo Pharmaceuticals and others over the Lidoderm pain relief patch, saying that although the process of apportioning damages might be complex, that's not a reason to deny certification.
-
October 04, 2016
FTC Warns Against Endo Privilege Request In Lidoderm MDL
The Federal Trade Commission on Monday said a California federal judge should not allow Endo Pharmaceuticals to selectively waive its privilege in pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation over the Lidoderm pain relief patch, saying it could adversely affect the interests of the U.S. government.
-
April 19, 2016
Endo, Others Denied Wholesale Info In Pay-For-Delay MDL
Drug retailers suing Endo Pharmaceuticals and others in pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation over the Lidoderm pain relief patch do not have to turn over their full supply contracts with wholesalers, at least for now, a California federal judge ruled Monday, saying that "downstream discovery" of that type is routinely denied.
-
November 25, 2015
Teikoku Loses Bid To Boot 12 Firms From Lidoderm MDL
A California federal judge on Wednesday refused to disqualify 12 law firms representing retailers in pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation over the Lidoderm pain relief patch, saying plaintiffs' attorneys' use of a privileged document mistakenly handed over by Japanese drugmaker Teikoku did not warrant disqualification.
-
November 11, 2015
Endo Has No Privilege To Withold SEC Drafts In Drug MDL
A California federal judge overseeing multidistrict pay-for-delay litigation against Endo Pharmaceuticals over its painkiller Lidoderm has said the company must hand over early drafts of a letter it sent the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, saying the drugmaker isn't entitled to attorney-client privilege.
-
November 05, 2015
Teikoku Backs Up Bid To DQ 12 Firms In Lidoderm MDL
Japanese drugmaker Teikoku doubled down Thursday on its bid to disqualify at least 12 law firms representing retailers in pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation over the drug Lidoderm for using a privileged document that was wrongly handed over, telling a California federal court it "should not hesitate" to toss the firms from the case.
-
October 29, 2015
Retailers Tell Court Not To DQ 12 Firms In Lidoderm MDL
Retailers in pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation over the drug Lidoderm pushed back against a bid by Japanese drugmaker Teikoku to disqualify at least 12 law firms representing them for using a privileged document that was wrongly handed over, telling a California federal court Wednesday that the document wasn't actually privileged at all.
-
October 15, 2015
Drugmaker Wants 12 Firms Booted From Pay-For-Delay MDL
Japanese drugmaker Teikoku on Wednesday asked a California federal court to disqualify 12 law firms representing retailers in antitrust litigation over the drug Lidoderm, saying the law firms "left their ethical obligations at the door" by capitalizing on a privileged email that was mistakenly handed to them.
-
July 20, 2015
Retailers' Claims Trimmed In Lidoderm Pay-For-Delay Case
A California federal judge on Friday struck certain antitrust claims Walgreen Co. and other indirect purchasers of pain medication Lidoderm brought in a pay-for-delay case against Endo Pharmaceuticals, though he has given the grocery stores chains a chance to amend their complaint.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →