In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:11-cv-06714
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Alioto Law Firm
- A&O Shearman
- Bartko Pavia
- Berman Tabacco
- Cravath Swaine
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Dentons
- Faegre Drinker
- Fox Rothschild
- George Feldman
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Hagens Berman
- Hueston Hennigan
- Kaufhold Gaskin
- Kellogg Hansen
- Kendall Brill
- King & Spalding
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale
- Maddin Hauser
- Massumi & Consoli
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Munger Tolles
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Saveri & Saveri
- Sheppard Mullin
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Walker Stevens
- Weil Gotshal
- White & Case
- Willkie Farr
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
- A&E Television Networks LLC
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Epic Games Inc.
- Google LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Playtika Ltd.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Showtime Networks Inc.
- Skype Technologies SA
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Starz LLC
- Valve Corp.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 05, 2012
Apple Says IPhone Service Monopoly Suit Ignores Court Order
Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge on Friday to dismiss a newly refiled class action claiming it monopolized the aftermarket for iPhone services, arguing that plaintiffs disregarded a court order to add AT&T Mobility LLC as a defendant.