Case Activity (49746)

1. Notice | Filed: July 17, 2026 | Entered: July 17, 2026 Piney et al v. City Of New York et al

   Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern

   Notice of Settlement

   NOTICE of Settlement with Defendant School of Visual Arts. Document filed by Wadih Abouabdallah, Brayan Antonio, John Cannon, Randy Chow, Sophia Daly, Devon Dawkins, Arturo Delgado, Claudio Diaz, Roman Diaz, James Divino, Dominique Eveillard, M. Mostayen Faysal, Anna Garlinska, Desmond Grant, Tuhin Khan, Michael Kmiotek, Tamara Lauzier, Jason Mansour, Jose Martinez, Michael Miron, Sudan Osorio, Jaynel Pantoja, Albert Piney, John Rondon, Julio Rosa, Charlie Ruiz-Reyes, Justin Senese, Freddy Suazo, Wang Ting, Alexis Yanez, Jorge Zorrilla..(Huot, Innessa)

2. Order | Filed: July 17, 2026 | Entered: July 17, 2026 Udler v. The City of New York et al

   Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

   Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer 1 - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings ~Util - Set Hearings

   ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer 9 is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendants City of New York and Officer Mohammed Suddah to respond to the Complaint is extended to 8/19/2026.

   The Initial Conference is adjourned from 8/12/2026 @ 11:45 AM until 9/9/2026 @ 2:30 PM in Courtroom 324N. The parties are reminded that they must file the proposed scheduling order on or before 9/2/2026.

   The Court grants this extension and adjournment to allow counsel for Defendant City time to obtain records otherwise sealed pursuant to NY CPL Section 160.50, investigate this matter, and make the representation decisions required of it by NY General Municipal Law Section 50-k. The Court further grants this extension as to Officer Suddah so that his defenses are not jeopardized while the City undertakes this investigation and makes its representation decision. However, the additional basis for the requested extension, that Defendants "have not yet received a HIPAA release from Plaintiff[,]" does not constitute good cause for an extension for either defendant. Dkt. No. 9 , p.1. Unlike the NY CPL Section 160.50 release, which is required for the City to access its own records, the HIPAA releases allow it to obtain non-party records about subsequent medical treatment. While it is in all parties' interest for a plaintiff to provide HIPAA releases in these kinds of cases at the earliest possible stage, and the Court applauds Plaintiff's agreement to do so, it is unclear why the City cannot respond to the complaint based solely on its own records and recollection of the events, and then obtain and review non-party records during discovery. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Seth D. Eichenholtz on 7/17/2026. (DC)

3. 49744 additional result(s)