Appellate

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Take Up Maine Lobster Boat Tracking Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to consider a constitutional challenge to Maine's tracking of vessels that hold federal lobster permits, a policy several lobster fishermen claimed violated their privacy rights.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Hear Corporate Transparency Act Challenges

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear two cases challenging the Corporate Transparency Act, a law designed to establish a national beneficial ownership registry for law enforcement agencies investigating shell companies that was severely curtailed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

  • October 05, 2026

    Sullivan & Cromwell Adds Ex-SG Assistants To Lead Appellate

    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP on Monday added two partners to lead the firm's Supreme Court and appellate practice, joining from McGuireWoods LLP and Ashurst Perkins Coie to fill a gap left after the firm's former appeals head departed for Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP this spring.

  • October 05, 2026

    Fox Tells DC Circ. Worker Wasn't Fired Over Leave, Politics

    Fox News urged the D.C. Circuit to reject a former Capitol Hill producer's bid to revive claims that he was fired over his political views and use of sick leave, arguing he was terminated instead for insubordination and unprofessional conduct.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Review John Doe Warrant, Trash DNA Test

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to a John Doe warrant and the warrantless collection and DNA testing of trash items used to convict a man in 2024 for the rape of a Penn State student in 1995.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Hear Google Maps Antitrust Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to scrutinize a Ninth Circuit decision declining to revive a proposed antitrust class action from app makers accusing Google of locking out rival maps products.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Seek Trump Admin's Views In Escrow-Interest Fight

    The U.S. Supreme Court asked Monday for the Trump administration to weigh in as the justices mull whether to take up a set of cases challenging whether federally chartered banks are exempt from state laws requiring lenders to pay interest on homeowners' escrow accounts.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Review Pregnancy Center Vandalism Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it will not review the conviction of a Florida woman for conspiring to violate a federal statute that prohibits intimidation and obstruction of people trying to access reproductive health facilities.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Turn Away Case Over NLRB Remedies And Review

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal of a Third Circuit ruling involving a number of labor issues, including the National Labor Relations Board's heightened remedies and the level of deference courts owe the agency.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Turns Away Delta Pilots' Military Leave Bias Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to hear former Delta Air Lines pilots' challenge to an Eleventh Circuit ruling that grounded their suit alleging the airline pushed them out of their jobs for taking military leave.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Review DirecTV Standing In Nexstar Fee Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to review whether DirecTV has standing to sue broadcast chain Nexstar for allegedly working with two other station owners to fix retransmission fees for broadcast programs.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Decline To Hear Post-Mallory Forum-Shopping Fight

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to consider whether state business-registration laws like Pennsylvania's asserting jurisdiction over out-of-state companies for out-of-state conduct alleged by out-of-state plaintiffs are unconstitutional under the dormant commerce clause.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Hear Chicago Workers' Vaccine Appeal

    The U.S. Supreme Court again refused Monday to weigh in on a challenge to COVID-19 vaccine and testing requirements for Chicago city workers, declining to take up the case after the Seventh Circuit refused to revive their lawsuit in December.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Pass On Former Air Marshal's Disability Bias Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to probe a Fourth Circuit ruling that upheld the dismissal of a former air marshal's disability bias suit, which claimed the government improperly required her to transfer positions rather than accommodate her vision issues.

  • October 05, 2026

    Supreme Court Won't Hear Tribal Card Check Order Challenge

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied a Native American tribe's challenge to an arbitrator's decision requiring it to follow election rules in an agreement with a UNITE HERE local that the tribe said violated tribal law.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Let Uber's Win Stand In Fatal Florida Crash Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a wrongful death suit over an accident that killed an Uber driver's ex-girlfriend, leaving in place a ruling that said the ride-sharing app could not be held liable because the driver was not logged into the app at the time of the crash.

  • October 05, 2026

    Supreme Court Won't Rethink Trucking Co. Bargaining Order

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a trucking company's bid to reverse a National Labor Relations Board order requiring it to bargain with a union, leaving in place a Fourth Circuit decision that found the order was supported by substantial evidence.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views On Tribal River Claims

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sought the solicitor general's views on whether Washington tribes can pursue damages against a Canadian mining company for alleged pollution to the Columbia River.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Wade Into Netflix ERISA Document Fight

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a Netflix employee health plan participant's challenge to a Ninth Circuit ruling that said contracts between Netflix and its health plan administrators weren't subject to disclosure under federal benefits law.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Hear Tribe's $208M Breach Of Trust Dispute

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a Nevada tribe's bid to revive $208 million in breach of trust claims against the federal government, leaving intact a Federal Circuit ruling the tribe said will reduce their homelands to "useless sand without water."

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Pass on Challenge to New York Diet Pill Law

    The U.S. Supreme Court won't take up a First Amendment challenge to a New York prohibition on the sale of weight-loss and muscle-building supplements to minors.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Hear Madoff Feeder Funds' Clawback Appeal

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied certiorari to a group of feeder funds that invested in the Ponzi scheme of Bernard L. Madoff, which sought to challenge a Second Circuit ruling that found their $6 billion in clawback claims were barred by a securities safe harbor of the bankruptcy code.

  • October 05, 2026

    Cop Fired After Posting Rap Videos Can't Get High Court's Ear

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to review a Black police officer's lawsuit claiming he was unlawfully fired after posting homemade rap videos online, declining his invitation to revisit a landmark 1973 ruling on evidentiary standards in bias cases.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Hear Minn. Indian Child Welfare Act Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear two foster parents' challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act after the Minnesota Supreme Court determined they don't have standing to take on the bedrock law on claims of constitutional equal protection rights.

  • October 05, 2026

    Supreme Court Won't Take Up DOD Workers' Vax Bias Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to review a suit alleging the U.S. Department of Defense unlawfully refused religious requests for exemptions from COVID-19 prevention protocols, leaving in place a Fifth Circuit ruling that workers hadn't tied their beliefs to masking and testing policies.

Expert Analysis

  • 3 Illinois Updates That Bolster Mortgage Lender Enforcement

    Author Photo

    Illinois lenders can use clarifications from recent legislative and judicial developments — a law defining the limitations period for home equity loans and two rulings on quiet title actions and lien expirations during foreclosures — to sharpen their enforcement tools and better protect their mortgage rights, says Stephanie Mulcahy at Hinshaw.

  • Series

    Mich. Banking Brief: All The Notable Legal Updates In Q3

    Author Photo

    We are at an inflection point for Michigan financial services law, with a state Supreme Court decision recently overruling more than 25 years of precedent on the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, and pending legislation that could significantly shift the regulatory landscape, say attorneys and advisers at Dykema.

  • The Patent Circuit: Marking Duties For Licensed Tech

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's decision in VDPP v. Volkswagen provides clarity on how the patent statute's marking provision applies to licensed technology, but expressly leaves open the question of how exactly patentees can make reasonable efforts to ensure licensees' marking compliance, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.

  • NY Art Ruling Creates Fault Line In Cultural Property Cases

    Author Photo

    A recent New York state appellate decision, blocking a Holocaust victim’s heirs from using a criminal turnover order to reclaim a work the Art Institute of Chicago says it acquired legally, makes establishing ownership a newly central question in cultural property disputes, says Duncan Levin at Levin & Associates.

  • What Anthropic Security Ruling Means For Gov't Contractors

    Author Photo

    In light of the D.C. Circuit ruling backing the U.S. Department of Defense's decision to remove Anthropic's Claude artificial intelligence models from its supply chain, there are a few steps contractors can take in response, including assessing whether to eliminate use of Anthropic products entirely, say attorneys at Blank Rome.

  • DC Circ. Ruling Highlights Limits Of DOE Grid Orders

    Author Photo

    The D.C. Circuit's recent decision in Michigan v. U.S. Department of Energy, vacating a DOE order to keep a coal-burning power plant open, gives utilities more insight into the durability of federal orders premised on protecting grid security, say attorneys at ArentFox Schiff.

  • Testing AI's Promise For Large-Scale Document Review

    Author Photo

    Our document-review comparison of attorneys' responsiveness and issue coding decisions versus predictions generated by artificial intelligence across 1,600 documents suggests that these tools can offer a reasonable and reliable basis for improved discovery workflows, provided lawyers understand where guardrails are needed, say attorneys at Redgrave.

  • Opinion

    Colo. Climate Suit Defies Limits Of State Power

    Author Photo

    In Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, the U.S. Supreme Court must not allow a single Colorado county to penalize pollution occurring across the country and around the globe, because the U.S. Constitution forbids states from exercising power beyond their borders, says Michael McGinley at Dechert.

  • What's Next For Prediction Markets If States Win At High Court

    Author Photo

    While the Supreme Court hasn't taken up a prediction market case yet, a high court win for the states in their quest to regulate the exchanges would likely mean a wave of state legislature bills and regulatory guidance arriving on different timelines, rather than a single uniform transition, says Howard Herndon at Bradley Arant.

  • 3rd Circ. Ruling Shows ADA Limits Amid Worker Misconduct

    Author Photo

    In Hileman v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, the Third Circuit recently rejected a wrongful termination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, illustrating that disability and leave laws don't automatically insulate employees from the consequences of prior workplace misconduct, say attorneys at Bond Schoeneck.

  • AI Meeting Recaps Pose New Discovery And Privilege Risks

    Author Photo

    The New York City Bar Association’s recent ethics opinion, cautioning attorneys not to record nonclient conversations with artificial intelligence tools, reflects an emerging view that AI meeting recaps are now a distinct business record category, meaning counsel should set meeting-level controls and apply framework-level updates, says William Wright at Faegre Drinker.

  • Class Actions At The Circuit Courts: September Lessons

    Author Photo

    In this month's review of class action appeals, Mitchell Engel at Shook Hardy discusses six recent rulings involving pecuniary loss in false price comparison advertising, privity in an insurance fee class, antitrust standing, immigration class representatives, retirement beneficiary class commonality, and Rule 23(f) appeals in Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

  • Florida Condo Ruling Offers Tips For Contractor Lien Disputes

    Author Photo

    A recent Florida appellate decision, holding condo owners may challenge liens placed on their units, despite not being party to the underlying disputed agreement their association struck with contractors, offers lessons on lien enforcement to both contractors and condo owners, say attorneys at Adams & Reese.

  • BIA Ruling Could Make Immigration Bond A Catch-22

    Author Photo

    A recent Board of Immigration Appeals decision refining the way immigration judges assess flight risk, when read broadly, could create a circular rule under which a noncitizen can be treated as a flight risk because they have too few ties to the U.S., but also because they have too many, says Georgianna Pisano Goetz at the National Immigrant Justice Center.

  • 8th Circ. Ruling Raises Bar For Seeking Disability Benefits

    Author Photo

    The Eighth Circuit's recent ruling in Post v. Bisignano signals that claimants seeking Social Security disability benefits may need to offer convincing proof of functional restrictions beyond their treating doctors' opinions and illustrates that the court's proclaimant jurisprudence no longer prevails, says Mark DeBofsky at DeBofsky Law.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here