California

  • November 14, 2025

    Lowe's Sheds Suit Over TikTok, Microsoft Trackers

    A California federal judge has thrown out a proposed class action accusing home improvement retailer Lowe's of illegally sharing website visitors' personal data with TikTok and Microsoft, finding that while the plaintiffs had adequately laid out their wiretap claim, they failed to allege the type of concrete injury necessary to sustain their suit.

  • November 14, 2025

    9th Circ. Judge Rips Feds For 'Trying To Suppress Speech'

    A Ninth Circuit panel expressed doubts Friday about the Trump administration's request to reconsider an order reinstating billions of dollars in University of California research grants in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, with one judge objecting that "the government is trying to suppress, to penalize speech."

  • November 14, 2025

    Judge Again Rejects Title IX, Class Rep Objections To NIL Deal

    The NCAA's $2.78 billion settlement with college athletes who sought compensation for their name, image and likeness survived objections from seven athletes who lodged various claims of discrimination and inadequate representation for future athletes.

  • November 14, 2025

    Stanford Credit Union Says Pig Butchering Scam Suit Misfires

    Stanford Federal Credit Union has asked a federal judge to toss claims alleging it failed to reasonably investigate fraud allegations by a couple who claim they lost $600,000 in a so-called pig butchering investing scam, arguing the wire transfers are outside the Fair Credit Billing Act's scope.

  • November 14, 2025

    Apple Hit By $634M Verdict Over Masimo Health Tech Patent

    A California federal jury on Friday awarded Masimo Corp. more than $634 million from Apple Inc. following an eight-day trial, finding that certain Apple Watches infringed one of Masimo's pulse oximetry patents with a feature that warns users if they have an abnormal heart rate. 

  • November 14, 2025

    Consumers Want 9th Circ. To Recertify Apple IPhone Class

    Apple users want the Ninth Circuit to restore the certification of their antitrust class accusing the technology giant of trapping them within the App Store, arguing a California federal judge improperly front-loaded the identification of individual members, when all that matters is that "nearly 200 million" users were harmed.

  • November 14, 2025

    Real Estate Recap: Public RMBS Revival?

    Catch up on this past week's key developments by state from Law360 Real Estate Authority — including a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission veteran's view into how public offerings of residential mortgage-backed securities could return for the first time since financial crisis-era reforms.

  • November 14, 2025

    Safeway Beats Claims It Falsely Advertised Wine Discount

    Grocery chain Safeway beat a proposed class action alleging that it hawks bogus, limited-time discounts on wine for its rewards members, after a California federal judge said Thursday that the members don't specifically allege how Safeway's representations were false or misleading, since higher, nonmember prices are unquestionably real prices charged to nonmembers. 

  • November 14, 2025

    Ethiopian Importer Asks Court To Enforce $5M Arbitration Win

    An Ethiopian import company has asked a California federal court to enforce a $5.3 million arbitral award against a medical supply company following a dispute over a botched contract.

  • November 14, 2025

    Google, TikTok, Meta Fight Calif. Law Over Kids' Online Feeds

    TikTok, Meta and Google filed separate suits against California Attorney General Rob Bonta in federal court on Thursday seeking to block the state from enforcing a new law's requirement for parental consent before online platforms can deliver personalized content feeds to children, saying the provision infringes on their First Amendment rights.

  • November 14, 2025

    9th Circ. Revives Deportation Case Due To Atty Errors

    A split Ninth Circuit panel revived a Ugandan man's removal case, with the majority ruling that immigration courts wrongly brushed off his claims of ineffective counsel.

  • November 14, 2025

    Junior Hockey Players Fight Wage Case Dismissal In Appeal

    Junior hockey players have asked the Ninth Circuit to reverse a lower court toss of their wage suppression suit against the National Hockey League and Canadian leagues, arguing that the territorial reach of U.S. antitrust laws gives United States federal courts jurisdiction.

  • November 14, 2025

    Chamber Asks Justices To Stop Calif. Climate Reporting Laws

    Business groups challenging California laws that require large companies to publicly disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to prohibit the state from enforcing the statutes during litigation in lower courts.

  • November 14, 2025

    Calif. Properties Off-Limits For Now In $300M Award Fight

    A New York federal judge won't allow a group of companies to take over two multimillion-dollar Napa Valley, California, properties in their bid to enforce a more than $300 million arbitral award in their dispute with fellow shareholders of a Latin American telecommunications company.

  • November 14, 2025

    Tribe Fights Enforcement Of Casino Union Recognition Order

    A California federal judge should forgo enforcing an arbitration award that requires a Native American tribe to work with UNITE HERE at a tribe-run casino, the tribe argued, saying the award is based on a flawed premise.

  • November 14, 2025

    Murder Conviction Tossed Over Judge's Texts To Prosecutor

    A Los Angeles Superior Court judge's midtrial text messages seeking to influence the prosecution's handling of a witness have caused a murder conviction to be overturned in California, after the attorney general's office conceded the messages showed too high a likelihood of judicial bias to be ignored.

  • November 14, 2025

    Keesal Young Fights Stradley Ronon Bid To Ax Poaching Suit

    Claiming that scheming and collusion is an "everyday" occurrence should not absolve a law firm from civil liability for poaching attorneys, California firm Keesal Young & Logan has told the Los Angeles County Superior Court, saying Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young LLP should not escape its suit on claims that its lawyer recruitment is normal.

  • November 14, 2025

    Manning Kass Hit With Age Bias Suit In Calif.

    Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP is facing an age bias lawsuit in California state court alleging a firm leader has made ageist comments at employees over 40 and is trying to drive those workers out of the firm.

  • November 14, 2025

    Fintech Co. Synapse's Ch. 11 Tossed After Failed Sale Efforts

    Former banking middleware firm Synapse Financial Technologies Inc.'s Chapter 11 has been dismissed by a California bankruptcy judge after the debtor said it didn't have the funds to try to sell its assets again.

  • November 13, 2025

    Apple, OpenAI Can't Yet Nix XAI Antitrust Suit, Judge Says

    A Texas federal judge on Thursday denied Apple and OpenAI's requests to toss an antitrust lawsuit that Elon Musk's xAI lodged to target a deal that integrated ChatGPT into the iPhone operating system, but suggested that resolving the suit without a jury trial may be the way to go.

  • November 13, 2025

    J&J Bellwether Trial Over Talc Cancer Risks Kicks Off In LA

    An attorney for one of two women who claim Johnson & Johnson's talcum products caused their ovarian cancer told a Los Angeles jury Thursday during opening statements in a bellwether trial that decades-old internal documents prove J&J knew its talc products contained toxic levels of asbestos but hid that information.

  • November 13, 2025

    Pipe Maker Names 2nd Firm In Asbestos RICO Suit

    A Los Angeles pipe manufacturer has added Massachusetts-based Sokolove Law to its civil racketeering lawsuit in Illinois federal court accusing Simmons Hanly Conroy LLP and others of orchestrating a scheme to fill the law firms' coffers by bringing baseless asbestos claims, alleging the Sokolove firm acted to find the cases.

  • November 13, 2025

    DOJ Sues Newsom Over Prop 50 Redistricting Plan

    California's voter-approved Proposition 50 plan for new congressional districts mandates "racial gerrymandering" in favor of Hispanic voters in violation of the equal protection clause, the U.S. Department of Justice alleges in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday against Gov. Gavin Newsom.

  • November 13, 2025

    San Diego Padres Eye Sale As Ownership Suit Unfolds

    Major League Baseball's San Diego Padres announced Thursday that they are exploring selling the franchise, while a court battle for control of the organization marches on with the widow of the team's former owner.

  • November 13, 2025

    9th Circ. Grills Casino, Insurer Over COVID-19 Coverage Row

    A Ninth Circuit panel sharply questioned a Las Vegas casino and resort and its insurer on Thursday over their dispute concerning whether losses from the COVID-19 pandemic can be considered a covered damage or loss to property.

Expert Analysis

  • 3 Trends From AI-Related Securities Class Action Dismissals

    Author Photo

    A review of recently dismissed securities class actions centering on artificial intelligence highlights courts' scrutiny of statements about AI's capabilities and independence, and sustained focus on issues that aren't AI-specific, say attorneys at Alston & Bird.

  • Calif. Justices Usher In Stricter Era For Wage Law Ignorance

    Author Photo

    In Iloff v. LaPaille, the California Supreme Court determined that neither an employer's ignorance of wage obligations nor a worker agreeing to an unconventional arrangement is sufficient to establish good faith, demonstrating that the era of casual wage arrangements without legal vetting is over, says Brandy Alonzo-Mayland at Michelman & Robinson.

  • What The New Nondomiciled-Trucker Rule Means For Carriers

    Author Photo

    A new Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration interim final rule restricting states' issuance of commercial drivers licenses to nondomiciled drivers does not alter motor carriers' obligations to verify drivers' qualifications, but may create disruptions by reducing the number of eligible drivers, say attorneys at Benesch.

  • Protecting Sensitive Court Filings After Recent Cyber Breach

    Author Photo

    In the wake of a recent cyberattack on federal courts' Case Management/Electronic Case Files system, civil litigants should consider seeking enhanced protections for sensitive materials filed under seal to mitigate the risk of unauthorized exposure, say attorneys at Redgrave.

  • Minimizing AI Bias Risks Amid New Calif. Workplace Rules

    Author Photo

    In light of California implementing new regulations to protect job applicants and employees from discrimination linked to artificial intelligence tools, employers should take proactive steps to ensure compliance, both to minimize the risk of discrimination and to avoid liability, says Alexa Foley at Gordon Rees.

  • Why Feds' Criminal Vehicle Tampering Theory Falls Short

    Author Photo

    In recent years, federal regulators have advanced a novel theory that reprogramming a vehicle's onboard diagnostics system is a crime under the Clean Air Act — but a case now pending in the Ninth Circuit shows that the government's position is questionable for a host of reasons, say attorneys at Arnold & Porter.

  • New Calif. Chatbot Bill May Make AI Assistants Into Liabilities

    Author Photo

    While a pending California bill aims to regulate emotionally engaging chatbots that target children, its definition of "companion chatbot" may cover more ground — potentially capturing virtual assistants used for customer service or tech support, and creating serious legal exposure for businesses, say attorneys at Crowell & Moring.

  • Training AI On Books: A Tale Of 2 Fair Use Rulings

    Author Photo

    Though two recent decisions from the Northern District of California concluded that training artificial intelligence with copyrighted books counts as fair use, certain meaningful differences in reasoning could affect pending and future cases, says Brett Carmody at Atheria Law.

  • Series

    Judging Figure Skating Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Judging figure skating competitions helps me hone the focus, decisiveness and ability to process complex real-time information I need in court, but more importantly, it makes me reengage with a community and my identity outside of law, which, paradoxically, always brings me back to work feeling restored, says Megan Raymond at Groombridge Wu.

  • $100K H-1B Fee May Disrupt Rural Healthcare Needs

    Author Photo

    The Trump administration's newly imposed $100,000 supplemental fee on new H-1B petitions may disproportionately affect healthcare employers' ability to recruit international medical graduates, and the fee's national interest exceptions will not adequately solve ensuing problems for healthcare employers or medically underserved areas, say attorneys at Holland & Knight.

  • Looking Beyond Property Damages For Wildfire Survivors

    Author Photo

    Personal injury attorneys seeking compensation for victims of wildfires like those in Los Angeles County must carefully apply a multidisciplinary approach that looks beyond obvious property loss to the full spectrum of damages, considering factors like emotional distress, disruption of community and the psychological toll of displacement, says Farid Yaghoubtil at Downtown L.A. Law Group.

  • Series

    Calif. Banking Brief: All The Notable Legal Updates In Q3

    Author Photo

    The third quarter of 2025 brought legislative changes to state money transmission certification requirements and securities law obligations, as well as high-profile accounting and anti-money laundering compliance enforcement actions by the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, say attorneys at Ropes & Gray.

  • Female Athletes' NIL Deal Challenge Could Be Game Changer

    Author Photo

    A challenge by eight female athletes to the NCAA’s $2.8 billion name, image and likeness settlement shows that women in sports are still fighting for their share — not just of money, but of respect, resources and representation, says Madilynne Lee at Anderson Kill.

  • What Ethics Rules Say On Atty Discipline For Online Speech

    Author Photo

    Though law firms are free to discipline employees for their online commentary about Charlie Kirk or other social media activity, saying crude or insensitive things on the internet generally doesn’t subject attorneys to professional discipline under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, says Stacie H. Rosenzweig at Halling & Cayo.

  • Junior Attys Must Beware Of 5 Common Legal Brief Mistakes

    Excerpt from Practical Guidance
    Author Photo

    Junior law firm associates must be careful to avoid five common pitfalls when drafting legal briefs — from including every possible argument to not developing a theme — to build the reputation of a sought-after litigator, says James Argionis at Cozen O'Connor.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the California archive.