Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC et al
Case Number:
1:10-cv-00564
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Banner Witcoff
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Blue Capital Law Firm
- Brooks Kushman
- Crowell & Moring
- Finnegan
- Fox Rothschild
- Gatlin Voelker
- Kegler Brown
- Kronenberger Rosenfeld
- Law Office of David A. Shough
- Lewis Brisbois
- Mayer Brown
- Porter Wright
- Rendigs Fry
- Roetzel & Andress
- Stoll Keenon
- Strauss Troy
- Wood Herron
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 27, 2014
Lexmark's Sales Abroad Didn't Exhaust Patents, Judge Rules
A federal judge ruled Thursday that Lexmark International Inc.'s sales of inkjet cartridges outside the U.S. did not exhaust its patent rights, holding that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that foreign sales exhaust the rights of copyright holders does not apply to patent law.
-
February 08, 2011
Lexmark Settles With 10 Firms In Ink Cartridge Suits
Lexmark International Inc. announced Tuesday that it has settled with 10 of the 24 companies it has sued in federal court and in the U.S. International Trade Commission for infringing 21 patents for ink cartridges.
-
August 23, 2010
Lexmark Launches Offensive Over Ink Cartridge Patents
Lexmark International Inc. has lodged actions in federal court and the U.S. International Trade Commission in an effort to stop more than 20 companies, including China-based Ninestar Image Co. Ltd., from importing and selling items that allegedly infringe 21 patents for ink cartridges.