Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Edmundson v. The Procter & Gamble Company
Case Number:
3:10-cv-02256
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
September 13, 2011
Gillette Shaves Last Claims From False Ad Action
A California federal judge on Thursday once again threw out a proposed class action accusing Procter & Gamble Co. division Gillette of deceptively advertising its Fusion Power razor system as superior in performance to a lower-cost version.
-
May 19, 2011
Gillette Shakes Consumer's False Ad Action
Procter & Gamble Co. division Gillette won the dismissal Tuesday of a proposed class action in California accusing the company of deceptively advertising its Fusion Power razor system as superior in performance to a lower-cost version.