Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Capital Blu Management, LLC et al
Case Number:
6:09-cv-00508
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 10, 2011
Capital Blu Execs To Pay $17.5M For Investment Fraud
A federal judge in Florida on Friday hit the three principals of defunct commodities trading adviser Capital Blu Management LLC with $17.5 million in fines and restitution for swindling investors in a fraudulent commodity pool.
-
December 07, 2010
CFTC Loses Bid For Quick Win In Capital Blu Fraud Suit
A federal judge has denied the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission's bid for summary judgment in a suit accusing Capital Blu Management LLC and its executives of operating a fraudulent $17 million commodity pool.
-
November 30, 2010
CFTC Ducks Sanctions Bid In $17M Fraud Suit
A federal judge has struck down a defendant's bid to impose sanctions on the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission in its suit accusing him and another man of operating a fraudulent $17 million commodity.
-
November 29, 2010
CFTC Can't Block Evidence Of Receiver Misdeeds
Two men accused by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission of operating a fraudulent $17 million commodity pool can tell jurors that the ex-receiver on the case misappropriated funds from their frozen assets, a federal judge has ruled.