Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Hobart Corporation et al v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:10-cv-00195
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Dinsmore & Shohl
- Kegler Brown
- Krieg DeVault
- Langsam Stevens
- Pickrel Schaeffer
- Quarles & Brady
- Sebaly Shillito
- Tucker Ellis
- Wactor & Wick
- Walter Haverfield
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 11, 2013
Coke, GSK Dodge Cleanup Claims Over Ohio Landfill
A federal judge on Friday said GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and several other companies don't have to contribute to a cleanup effort at a polluted Ohio landfill because the companies seeking payment are limited to a statutory claim that is time-barred.
-
February 10, 2011
Judge Pares Enviro Claims Against Bridgestone, Others
A federal judge narrowed an environmental waste cleanup suit against Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC and others Thursday, citing case law barring plaintiffs from claiming unjust enrichment on obligatory remedial costs.