Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al v. Amersham PLC, et al
Case Number:
1:02-cv-08448
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Anderson Kill
- Arnold & Porter
- Carter Ledyard
- Fish & Richardson
- Fitzpatrick Cella
- Greenberg Traurig
- Kenyon & Kenyon
- Mintz Levin
- Ropes & Gray
- Schoeman Updike
- Sidley Austin
- Troutman Pepper
- White & Case
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 22, 2013
Enzo's Contract Claims Over DNA Testing Tech Tossed
A New York federal judge on Tuesday tossed the remainder of a lawsuit by Enzo Biochem Inc. accusing Amersham PLC of violating a distribution agreement for DNA testing technology and unfair competition, saying all the claims are time-barred or without merit.
-
July 21, 2006
Roche Rallies In Wake Of Enzo Biochem Ruling
Just days after a federal court issued a Markman ruling in a drawn-out patent battle between Enzo Biochem Inc. and a group of rival biotech companies, Roche Molecular Diagnostics said Friday that the ruling is in its favor, despite Enzo’s earlier claims to the contrary.
-
July 19, 2006
Court Issues Markman Ruling In Enzo Biochem Case
Marking the latest development in an ongoing patent feud between Enzo Biochem Inc. and a group of rival biotechnology companies, a federal court issued a Markman ruling Wednesday on the constructions of several disputed claims in the case.