Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE: IKO ROOFING SHINGLE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Case Number:
2:09-md-02104
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Baillon Thome
- Bolen Robinson
- Cable Langenbach
- Carey Danis
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Donahue Tucker
- Eimer Stahl
- Fredrikson & Byron
- Heyl Royster
- Lanham Blackwell
- Levin Sedran
- Lockridge Grindal
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Pearson Warshaw
- Quinn Johnston
- Sulloway & Hollis
- Tousley Brain
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 11, 2019
Ill. Judge Ends Shoddy Roofing MDL After OK'ing $30M Deal
The Illinois federal court overseeing the multidistrict litigation over IKO Manufacturing's allegedly shoddy roofing shingles formally shut down the case on Thursday, after approving a $30 million settlement last month.
-
February 28, 2019
Attys In $30M Roofing MDL Deal Seek $7.5M In Fees
Attorneys who helped ink a $30 million deal to end multidistrict litigation alleging IKO Manufacturing’s roofing shingles deteriorated earlier than promised have asked an Illinois federal judge for $7.5 million in attorneys’ fees, costs and awards to named plaintiffs.
-
October 05, 2018
Consumers In Roof Shingle MDL Seek OK On $30M Deal
Roof shingle maker IKO Manufacturing and a proposed class of customers who say the company's shingles deteriorated earlier than promised have reached a $30 million deal to end the multidistrict litigation, attorneys for the plaintiffs told an Illinois federal judge.
-
October 23, 2014
Shoddy-Shingle Claims Are Time-Barred, Manufacturer Says
A roofing shingle manufacturer facing a proposed consumer class action accusing the company of exaggerating its products' durability and quality asked an Illinois federal court Wednesday to dismiss the suit, saying the claims are time-barred.