Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Crowell et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
Case Number:
7:10-cv-01116
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 22, 2012
Wal-Mart Beats $20M Age Bias Suit
A New York federal judge on Thursday found that an employee who had accused Wal-Mart Stores Inc. of giving older workers undesirable tasks and firing them at a higher rate hadn't offered enough evidence, tossing an age bias suit that had initially sought $20 million.
-
February 12, 2010
Wal-Mart Slapped With $20M Age Bias Suit
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is facing yet another employment discrimination suit, this time by over-40 employees who allege they are entitled to $20 million in damages due to the company's “systematic scheme” to reduce and replace older workers with younger people.