Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Shy, et al v. Navistar Int'l Corp, et al
Case Number:
3:92-cv-00333
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bredhoff & Kaiser
- Cloppert Latanick
- Cohen Weiss
- Coolidge Wall
- EascoLaw PLLC
- Franczek PC
- Groom Law Group
- Hunter Carnahan
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Latham & Watkins
- Markovits Stock
- Morgan Lewis
- Vorys
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 11, 2017
Navistar Says Retiree Group Can't Pursue New Benefit Claim
Navistar International Corp. on Tuesday urged an Ohio federal court to dismiss a claim by a committee of retirees that the heavy truck and engine manufacturer is skirting an underlying settlement that resolved an earlier dispute over prescription drug benefits, arguing that the retirees have no viable claim.
-
March 27, 2015
Navistar Didn't Waive Arbitration In Benefit Row: 6th Circ.
The Sixth Circuit on Thursday vacated and remanded a district court's ruling that Navistar International Corp.'s conduct during an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fight invalidated the arbitration clause in an agreement with a benefit committee, saying its refusal to arbitrate doesn't constitute a waiver of the clause.
-
December 14, 2012
6th Circ. Finds Navistar Violated Benefits Agreement
The Sixth Circuit said Friday that Navistar International Corp. violated a 1993 settlement agreement in a class action over its efforts to rein in benefits costs when it unilaterally changed prescription drug benefits for retirees in 2010, upholding a lower court ruling against the truck maker.
-
February 28, 2011
Truck Maker Takes Drug Benefits Case To 6th Circ.
A truck maker Monday said it would ask the Sixth Circuit to reverse a ruling that the manufacturer lacked the authority to change prescription drug benefits for retirees under a 1993 class action settlement.