Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re the EXXON VALDEZ
Case Number:
3:89-cv-00095
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ashburn & Mason
- Atkinson Conway & Gagnon Inc.
- Bankston Gronning
- Bookman & Helm
- Goodin MacBride
- Hausfeld LLP
- Holland & Knight
- Levin Sedran
- Oles Morrison
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Perkins Coie
- Reeves Amodio
- Schroeter Goldmark
- Sonosky Chambers
- Williams Kastner
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 29, 2016
Alaska Judge Rebuffs Fish Co.'s $8.5M Exxon Valdez Claim
Wrapping up loose ends in a decadelong battle over interest and fees from an Exxon Valdez oil spill settlement, an Alaska federal judge on Monday said Exxon Mobil Corp. owes a seafood processing company about $2.65 million, rather than the $8.5 million the seafood company claimed.
-
July 25, 2016
Exxon Still Owes $8.5M From Valdez Spill, Fish Co. Says
A seafood processing company told an Alaska federal judge Friday that after a decade of battling ExxonMobil over interest calculations on a settlement from the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the oil giant still owes it $8.5 million in interest and attorneys' fees.
-
September 11, 2009
Seafood Cos.' Suit Over Exxon Valdez Deal Stayed
A lawsuit filed by seafood processors against Exxon Mobil Corp. over the interest rate for a settlement related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill has been stayed pending the end of connected state court litigation, in the latest development in a long-running fight.
-
May 20, 2009
Exxon Owes At Least $3M But Can Wait To Pay: Judge
While Exxon Mobil Corp. and seafood processor Nautilus Marine Enterprises Inc. squabble over the amount of interest Exxon owes under a settlement related to the Valdez oil spill, a federal judge has frustrated Nautilus’ attempt to promptly collect more than $3 million Exxon will eventually have to fork over.