Solid 21, Inc. v. Hublot of America et al

  1. June 15, 2015

    Louis Vuitton Wins Ruling That 'Red Gold' Is Generic

    Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy Inc. won a ruling Friday in that "red gold" is a generic term, a reversal of an earlier decision that the California federal judge now says was a "misinterpretation" of Ninth Circuit trademark case law.

  2. October 30, 2014

    Louis Vuitton Wants 9th Circ. Call On 'Always Generic' Rule

    Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy Inc. wants the Ninth Circuit to immediately weigh in on whether a Los Angeles jeweler can claim the term "Red Gold" as a trademark, saying a district judge issued an aberrational ruling that a generic term could transform into a trademark.

  3. September 29, 2014

    Louis Vuitton Loses Bid To Sink 'Red Gold' Mark As Generic

    A California federal judge on Monday refused Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy Inc.'s request to toss a Los Angeles jeweler's trademark infringement suit on grounds the jeweler's "Red Gold" trademark is generic, ruling that whether the mark is protectable is a "very close question" for a jury to decide.

  4. April 25, 2014

    Louis Vuitton Knocks Jeweler's 'Red Gold' Mark As Generic

    A Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy Inc. subsidiary urged a California district judge to toss a suit alleging the luxury watchmaker infringes a Los Angeles jeweler's registered trademark for "Red Gold," arguing Friday that decades of evidence show the mark is generic and should be canceled.