Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Arminak and Associates Inc v. Saint-Gobain Calmar Inc
Case Number:
8:04-cv-01455
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Blecher Collins
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Finnegan
- Foley & Lardner
- Greenberg Traurig
- Haynes & Boone
- Kelley Drye
- Kesselman Brantly
- K&L Gates
- Lewis Brisbois
- Manatt Phelps
- McGuireWoods
- Reed Smith
- Snell & Wilmer
- Stubbs Alderton
- Troutman Pepper
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 14, 2011
9th Circ. Rejects Arminak Appeal In Antitrust Suit
The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday declined to hear Arminak & Associate Inc.'s appeal of a lower court decision limiting evidence in a long-running antitrust suit against MeadWestvaco Calmar Inc. for an alleged plot to monopolize the trigger sprayers market.
-
June 13, 2011
Legal Acts Can't Be Evidence In Arminak Suit: Judge
A California federal judge on June 7 refused to let Arminak & Associates Inc. argue in its long-running antitrust suit against Mead Westvaco Calmar Inc. that lawful actions taken by Calmar were part of a plot to monopolize the trigger sprayers market.