Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Jill Guido et al v. L Oreal, USA Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-01067
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
July 01, 2013
Class Cert. In L'Oreal Hair Serum Case Tentatively Denied
A California federal judge indicated Monday she will deny certification of a class of California consumers who allege L'Oreal USA Inc. deceptively marketed a hair care serum without a flammability warning, saying the plaintiffs had failed to show a method for proving damages on a classwide basis.
-
May 07, 2012
L'Oreal Says Hair Serum Plaintiffs Lack Standing To Sue
L'Oreal USA Inc. urged a California federal judge on Monday to reverse a tentative ruling certifying a putative class in a suit that claims the company failed to warn consumers about a flammable anti-frizz hair care serum, arguing the named plaintiffs lack standing to file the suit.
-
June 27, 2011
Judge Rejects L'Oreal Bid To Kick Hair Serum Suit
A California federal judge issued a tentative ruling Monday denying L'Oreal USA Inc.'s motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging the company failed to warn consumers about a flammable anti-frizz hair care serum in violation of state consumer protection and business competition laws.