Calibuso et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al

  1. December 02, 2013

    $39M Merrill Lynch Deal Won't Stop Sex Bias, Judge Told

    A group of female financial advisers employed by Bank of America Corp. and its Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. unit urged a New York federal judge Friday to reject a proposed $39 million class action gender discrimination settlement, saying the deal would "enshrine" sex bias on Wall Street.

  2. September 06, 2013

    BofA To Pay $39M To Settle Sex Bias Class Action

    Bank of America Corp. and Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. have agreed to pay $39 million to settle a class action brought by women employed as financial advisers for alleged discrimination in compensation and business opportunities, according to a motion filed Friday in New York federal court.

  3. September 27, 2012

    BofA Can't Use Dukes To Kill Class Claims In Sex Bias Suit

    A New York federal judge on Thursday denied Bank of America Corp.'s bid to nix class claims in a lawsuit accusing the company of underpaying female financial advisers, saying the bank's argument that the U.S. Supreme Court's Dukes decision precluded those claims was premature.

  4. August 09, 2011

    BofA Says Dukes Thwarts Sex Bias Action

    Citing the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, Bank of America Corp. on Tuesday asked a New York federal judge to dismiss a similar class action brought by female employees who claim they are underpaid compared with men.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!