Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
MetroPCS Wireless Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:11-cv-00829
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker & Hostetler
- Boies Schiller
- Davis Polk
- Farmer Brownstein
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Gibson Dunn
- Hillis Clark
- K&L Gates
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- McKool Smith
- Morgan Lewis
- Nossaman LLP
- Paul Weiss
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- White & Case
Companies
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- MetroPCS Wireless Inc.
- Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Toshiba Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 25, 2012
Sanyo Loses MetroPCS Fight In LCD Price-Fixing MDL
A California federal judge on Wednesday rejected Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co. Ltd.'s attempt to challenge a ruling that MetroPCS Wireless Inc. had adequately pled price-fixing claims in a multidistrict litigation against Sanyo and other liquid crystal display panel makers.
-
October 27, 2011
LCD Screen Makers Can't Nix MetroPCS' Price-Fixing Claims
A California federal judge refused Wednesday to dismiss MetroPCS Wireless Inc.'s price-fixing claims in multidistrict litigation against a slew of display-panel makers, ruling that the statute of limitations for the Illinois antitrust claims had not expired.