Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Wofford et al v. Apple Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:11-cv-00034
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 25, 2012
False Ad Claims Survive In Suit Over Buggy IPhone Upgrade
A California federal judge on Wednesday let false advertising claims stand in a putative class action alleging Apple Inc. distributed software updates that impaired older iPhones, but dismissed claims that Apple broke implied warranties and interfered with AT&T Mobility LLC contracts.
-
November 09, 2011
Apple Dodges IPhone OS Sabotage Suit
A California federal judge on Wednesday tossed a proposed class action accusing Apple Inc. of issuing iPhone operating system updates that impaired certain models, stating that the claims did not meet the requirement for state consumer law violations because the upgrades were free.