Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Oliver et al v. SD-3 LLC et al
Case Number:
3:11-cv-01260
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Bingham McCutchen
- Davis Polk
- Dewey & LeBoeuf
- Fish & Richardson
- Goldman Scarlato
- Latham & Watkins
- Susman Godfrey
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 22, 2012
Panasonic, Others Beat Memory Card Antitrust Claims
A California federal judge on Monday tossed a putative consumer class action alleging that Panasonic Corp., Toshiba Corp. and SanDisk Corp. tried to corner the secure disk memory cards market by requiring competitors to enter restrictive patent-licensing agreements.
-
August 04, 2011
Panasonic Gets Fish Kicked Off Antitrust Class Action
A California federal judge on Thursday granted Panasonic Corp.'s motion to disqualify Fish & Richardson PC from representing a putative class that claims the company conspired to control patent rights to secure digital cards because of a Fish attorney's previous representation of Panasonic.
-
June 07, 2011
Panasonic Wants Fish Off Antitrust Suit Over Patents
Panasonic Corp. asked a California federal court Monday to bar Fish & Richardson PC from representing a putative class of consumers accusing the electronics giant of conspiring to control patent rights to secure digital cards, citing a Fish attorney's previous representation of the company.
-
March 16, 2011
Toshiba, Others Accused Of $1B Digital Card Cartel
A putative class filed suit Tuesday in California against Panasonic Corp., Toshiba Corp. and SanDisk Corp., alleging they overcharged consumers by up to $1 billion through a cartel to control intellectual property rights to secure-digital cards.