Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Dobina v. Weatherford International Ltd. et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-01646
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Davis Polk
- Freed Kanner
- Glancy Prongay
- Jones Day
- Kessler Topaz
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko
- Mayer Brown
- Robbins Geller
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 06, 2015
Kessler's 600% Markup On Contract Attys Ruled Too High
A New York federal judge slashed Kessler Topaz's fee request in an investor class action against Weatherford International Ltd. from $14 million to $10.8 million, saying contract attorneys were billed for at too high a markup.
-
January 29, 2014
Weatherford To Pay $52.5M To End Tax Flub Class Action
Weatherford International Ltd. and several executives have agreed to pay $52.5 million to settle an investor class action over tax miscalculations by the energy equipment company that overstated earnings by about $500 million, plaintiffs' attorneys told a New York federal judge Wednesday.
-
November 08, 2012
Judge Pares Investor Claims Over $500M Weatherford Tax Flub
A New York federal judge on Wednesday threw out much of an investor class action brought against Weatherford International Ltd., several executives and Ernst & Young over tax miscalculations by the energy equipment company that overstated earnings by about $500 million, finding the investors didn't plead their case properly.