Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
USA v. DUKE ENERGY CORP.
Case Number:
1:00-cv-01262
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Brooks Pierce
- Ellis & Winters
- Hunton Andrews
- Maynard Nexsen
- O'Hagan Meyer
- Sidley Austin
- Williams & Connolly
- Winston & Strawn
- Wyrick Robbins
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 11, 2015
Duke Strikes $5.4M Deal With EPA In Coal Plant Saga
Duke Energy Corp. will pay a $975,000 fine and spend at least $4.4 million on environmental projects, ending a suit scheduled for trial next month alleging Duke illegally modified equipment at coal-fired plants across North Carolina, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday.
-
March 17, 2014
EPA Can't Bag Win In Duke Coal Plant Permitting Case
A North Carolina judge on Monday sent to trial the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's closely watched suit alleging Duke Energy Corp. improperly modified 13 coal-fired power plants, finding that the resulting emissions increases did not unequivocally trigger Clean Air Act permitting requirements.
-
November 07, 2013
Duke Energy Can't Shake EPA's Clean Air Act Suit
A North Carolina federal judge on Wednesday declined to dismiss the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's suit alleging Duke Energy Corp. violated the Clear Air Act when it modified some of its plants, ruling Duke could not exclude government experts key to the EPA's case.