Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
MGA Entertainment Inc et al v. The Hartford Insurance Group
Case Number:
5:08-cv-00457
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Faegre Drinker
- Greenberg Traurig
- McCormick Barstow
- Mendes & Mount
- Musick Peeler
- Ropers Majeski
- Shernoff Bidart
- Squire Patton
- Troutman Pepper
Companies
- Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.
- Lexington Insurance Co.
- MGA Entertainment Inc.
- The Hartford Financial Services Group Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 25, 2013
No Bratz Coverage For MGA, 9th Circ. Hears
Lexington Insurance Co. and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co. urged the Ninth Circuit on Thursday to vacate a lower court ruling ordering them to pay millions of dollars in legal fees for MGA Entertainment Inc.'s Bratz doll trade secrets fight, arguing the district judge erroneously imposed a duty to defend unpled allegations.
-
June 08, 2012
MGA Insurer Takes Bratz Defense Dispute To 9th Circ.
MGA Entertainment Inc. primary insurer Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co. appealed to the Ninth Circuit on Thursday a ruling that it had a duty to defend MGA in its trade secrets and copyright dispute with Mattel Inc. over Bratz dolls.
-
April 12, 2012
MGA's Excess Insurers Off Hook For Bratz Defense
A California federal judge on Thursday ruled that three Chartis Inc. companies, as excess insurers, have no duty to defend MGA Entertainment Inc. in its Bratz trade secrets battle with Mattel Inc.
-
April 10, 2012
Evanston's Bratz Defense Bill Should Be $11M, Chartis Says
Three Chartis Inc. companies urged a California federal judge Tuesday to increase Evanston Insurance Co.'s share of costs related to the defense of MGA Entertainment Inc. in its Bratz trade secrets battle with Mattel Inc., bumping Evanston's liability from $8.5 million to $10.9 million.
-
February 27, 2012
Chartis Wins $8.5M From Evanston For Bratz Defense
Evanston Insurance Co. owes three Chartis Inc. companies about $8.5 million for costs related to the defense of MGA Entertainment Inc. in its trade secrets battle with Mattel Inc. over the popular Bratz doll line, a California federal judge ruled Friday.
-
February 16, 2012
Insurers Must Defend MGA In Bratz Trade Secrets Suit
Insurers Markel Corp. and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co. have a duty to defend MGA Entertainment Inc. in its trade secrets battle with Mattel Inc. over the popular Bratz doll line, a California federal judge ruled Tuesday.
-
January 30, 2012
MGA's Coverage Suit Over Bratz Battle Survives
A California federal judge on Friday refused to toss MGA Entertainment Inc.'s suit seeking millions of dollars in insurance coverage for its trade secrets battle with Mattel Inc. over the popular Bratz dolls, saying the underlying suit alleged covered advertising injuries.