Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Robert Juan Dartez, LLC et al v. The United States of America
Case Number:
3:11-cv-00602
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
-
May 11, 2011
Investors Say SEC Not Exempt From Stanford Gaffes
Investors suing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over its failure to stop Robert Allen Stanford's alleged Ponzi scheme told a Texas federal court Tuesday that the agency is not shielded by a law barring suits over federal officials' discretionary choices.
-
April 08, 2011
US Argues Investors Can't Sue SEC Over Stanford Fraud
Prosecutors asked a Texas federal judge Thursday to dismiss investors' allegations that they lost more than $18 million because a conflict of interest within the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission kept it from halting Robert Allen Stanford's Ponzi scheme.
-
March 24, 2011
La. Investors Sue SEC Over Stanford Failures
A group of Louisiana investors who lost more than $18 million to Robert Allen Stanford sued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in Texas on Thursday, alleging a conflict of interest within the agency kept it from halting the fraudster's Ponzi scheme.