Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Abbott et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:06-cv-00701
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Armstrong Teasdale
- Bailey & Glasser
- Cassiday Schade
- Dowd Bennett
- Goldenberg Heller
- Mayer Brown
- Schlichter Bogard
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Thompson Coburn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 20, 2015
Schlichter Bogard Scores $22M In Lockheed ERISA Settlement
An Illinois federal judge on Friday granted Schlichter Bogard & Denton LLP $22.3 million in attorneys' fees for the firm's work successfully driving a cumulative $62 million settlement against Lockheed Martin Corp. for retirement plan participants who accused the company of losing nearly $300 million of their investments.
-
February 20, 2015
Lockheed Strikes $62M Deal In Retirement Losses Saga
Lockheed Martin Corp. on Friday agreed to pay $62 million to settle with a class of retirement plan participants who accused the company of losing nearly $300 million of their investments, resolving an eight-year row that at one point made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
December 16, 2014
Lockheed, Class Ready To Talk On Cusp Of ERISA Trial
Lockheed Martin Corp. agreed Tuesday to settle with a class of retirement plan participants who accused the company of losing $293 million of their investment, ending eight years of Employee Retirement Income Security Act litigation that once made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.