Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Washington et al v. Kellwood Company
Case Number:
1:05-cv-10034
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
September 22, 2016
Apparel Co. Fights To Keep Contract Row Verdict Vacated
Clothing maker Kellwood Co. urged a New York federal judge on Wednesday to permanently vacate the $8.3 million in damages a jury found it owed a business partner for reneging on a deal to make and market his clothing line, saying the partner failed to prove lost business value damages.
-
July 18, 2016
$8.3M Jury Award Thrown Out In Apparel Co.'s Contract Row
A New York federal judge on Friday vacated a jury award of $8.3 million in damages in Daryl K. Washington's suit accusing a former business partner, clothing maker Kellwood Co., of backing out of a deal to manufacture his clothing line.
-
March 11, 2016
Apparel Co. Wants New Contract Trial After $8.3M Verdict
Clothing maker Kellwood Co. on Friday asked a New York federal court for a new trial after being ordered to pay $8.3 million to a business partner after a jury found it wrongfully backed out of an agreement to manufacture and market his line of athletic apparel and launched its own.
-
March 07, 2016
Apparel Co. Fights $8.3M Award In Activewear Contract Suit
Clothing maker Kellwood Co. on Monday appealed to the Second Circuit a New York federal court decision ordering it to pay $8.3 million to a business partner after a jury found it wrongfully backed out of an agreement to manufacture and market his line of athletic apparel and launched its own.