Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC et al v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-01049
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Blank Rome
- Boies Schiller
- Clyde & Co
- Covington & Burling
- Jones Day
- Keller & Anderle
- Mayer Brown
- Munger Tolles
- Robins Kaplan
- Shinder Cantor
- Troutman
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 16, 2011
Union Pacific, BNSF Slam 'Incoherent' Antitrust Suit
Union Pacific Railroad Co. and BNSF Railway Co. fired back at Oxbow Carbon LLC on Monday, claiming the coal shipper's "incoherent" antitrust claims against them did not plausibly demonstrate that they fixed shipping prices.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →