Malena et al v. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:09-cv-05849

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Fair Standards

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

J. Paul Oetken

Firms

Sectors & Industries:

  1. October 24, 2012

    Victoria's Secret Settles Pregnancy Bias, Wage Suit

    A New York federal judge agreed Friday to dismiss pregnancy bias, retaliation and wage-and-hour claims brought against Victoria's Secret parent company Limited Brands Inc. after the parties reached a settlement in the certified collective action.

  2. August 17, 2012

    Victoria's Secret Parent Can't Duck All Pregnancy Bias Claims

    A New York federal judge pared down a pregnancy discrimination and overtime collective action against Victoria's Secret parent Limited Brands Inc. on Thursday, but refused to nix pregnancy bias and retaliation claims against the company.

  3. August 22, 2011

    Victoria's Secret Parent Sanctioned In OT Case

    A New York federal judge on Friday partially granted a bid for sanctions against Victoria's Secret parent Limited Brands Inc. after a former executive assistant claimed the company pressured potential opt-in plaintiffs not to join an overtime collective action.

  4. July 05, 2011

    Victoria's Secret Pressured Class Members: Plaintiff

    The plaintiff in a proposed class action alleging Limited Brands Inc.-owned Victoria's Secret failed to pay executive assistants overtime asked a New York federal judge Friday to sanction the company for allegedly coercing potential class members not to join the action.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!