Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
HUGHES v. PANASONIC CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY et al
Case Number:
2:10-cv-00846
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 19, 2012
Judge Pulls Plug On Faulty Panasonic Plasma TV Claims
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday dismissed for the second time a class action accusing Panasonic Corp. of hiding the declining picture quality of its plasma TVs from consumers, ruling the plaintiffs failed to make specific enough allegations in an amended complaint to keep the suit alive.
-
July 21, 2011
Panasonic Plasma TV Class Action Turned Off
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday tossed a putative class action alleging Panasonic Corp.'s Viera plasma televisions made in 2008 and 2009 do not retain their picture quality over the long haul, but left the plaintiffs 30 days to replead their claims.