Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Cole et al v. Baum, P.C.
Case Number:
1:11-cv-03779
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
July 16, 2013
Law Firm Ducks 'Shadow Docket' Foreclosure Action
Two New York City homeowners who filed a class action against a law firm they claim subjected them to increased loan penalties by leaving them stuck in New York's bank foreclosure "shadow docket" saw their claims under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act dismissed Friday.
-
August 05, 2011
Baum Hit With Unfair Foreclosure Suit Over Unfiled Forms
Homeowners hit Steven J. Baum PC with a putative class action Thursday in New York federal court, accusing the foreclosure law firm of unfair debt collection and deceptive practices for not filing documents triggering state-mandated settlement conferences in foreclosure actions.