Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Natalie Pappas v. Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-08276
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Francis Mailman
- Gibson Dunn
- Glancy Prongay
- Kron & Card
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Lyon Legal
- The Golan Firm
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 08, 2013
$9M Naked Juice Settlement Gets Judge's Go-Ahead
Brushing aside objections to a $3.1 million attorneys' fees award, a California judge on Wednesday approved a proposed $9 million settlement in a class action accusing PepsiCo Inc.'s Naked Juice Co. of misleading consumers about the "all natural" content of its products.
-
July 26, 2013
Fees Too Big A Slice Of Pepsi 'Naked' Deal, Some Plaintiffs Say
Plaintiffs who say PepsiCo Inc.'s Naked Juice Co. misled them into believing their juices contain 100 percent natural ingredients, but disagree over whether a proposed $9 million settlement should be consummated, meet in Los Angeles federal court Monday to hash out their differences.
-
July 03, 2013
Naked Juice To Pay $9M To End 'All Natural' False Ad Suit
Naked Juice Co. of Glendora Inc. has agreed to shell out $9 million to settle a consolidated putative class action in California alleging that it falsely advertised some of its juice and smoothie products as "all natural" and non-genetically modified, court documents filed Tuesday said.
-
May 14, 2012
Naked Juice Gets 'All-Natural' Class Action Stripped Down
A California federal judge on Monday partially dismissed class claims that Naked Juice Co. of Glendora Inc. violated consumer laws by mislabeling its drinks as all-natural, saying a federal warranty claim was permanently barred but that the plaintiffs could restate California consumer law claims.