Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Adaptix, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Case Number:
6:12-cv-00017
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Baker Botts
- Blank Rome
- Hayes Messina
- Law Office of David Keyzer
- Leason Ellis
- McCarter & English
- Morgan Lewis
- Nelson Bumgardner
- Nutter McClennen
- Orrick Herrington
- Potter Minton
- Prince Lobel
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 23, 2014
Telecom Giants Look To Revive Adaptix Fight Post-Nautilus
The fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision easing the path toward invalidating vague patents continued Monday as AT&T Inc. and other telecommunications firms pushed a Texas federal judge to revisit his decision rejecting their bid to toss the bulk of infringement claims lodged by Adaptix Inc.
-
May 29, 2014
Telecom Giants Win Dismissal Of 3 Claims In Patent Row
A Texas federal judge on Thursday shut down most of a bid by AT&T Inc. and others to end parts of three lawsuits alleging the companies are infringing on cell phone technology patents held by Adaptix Inc., but granted a motion for summary judgment on three claims in one of the patents in suit.