Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Universal Electronics Inc v. Universal Remote Control Inc
Case Number:
8:12-cv-00329
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Gibson Dunn
- Holland & Hart
- Jones Day
- Lee Sheikh
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Ostrolenk Faber
- Sidley Austin
- Tucker Ellis
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 08, 2015
Remote Control Maker Wins $4.6M Fees In Patent Row
A California federal judge on Friday ordered Universal Electronics Inc. to pay $4.6 million in attorneys' fees and costs to rival Universal Remote Control Inc. in a failed suit over four remote control patents, after previously ruling that the company must pay fees under the U.S. Supreme Court's Octane ruling.
-
March 12, 2015
Remote Control Patent Case Warrants Atty Fees: Judge
A California federal judge has ruled that Universal Electronics Inc. must pay some of the attorneys' fees that rival Universal Remote Control Inc. incurred defending itself in a failed suit over four remote control patents, after finding the case was filed in part as "payback" for URC's success in the market.